May 3, 2026

196. Q&A: Unannounced Learning Stalks, Parent Emails & Are SATs Pointless?

196. Q&A: Unannounced Learning Stalks, Parent Emails & Are SATs Pointless?
196. Q&A: Unannounced Learning Stalks, Parent Emails & Are SATs Pointless?
Teach Sleep Repeat
196. Q&A: Unannounced Learning Stalks, Parent Emails & Are SATs Pointless?

A teacher is getting emails from a parent at 10pm most nights with an expectation of a reply before school the next morning. Their SLT's advice? Just manage the relationship. Dylan and Hayden have slightly stronger thoughts on that.

Then unannounced learning walks, two-line feedback emails with no right of reply, and the working wall that was too busy one week and lacking evidence of learning the next. How is anyone supposed to win? Dylan and Hayden get into why this kind of observation culture does more damage to staff than it does good for children.

A listener writes in to defend SATs, and wants to know if they are in the minority. Every other year group does end of year tests. It narrows focus. It prepares children for formal assessment later in life. It can be done badly but that does not mean scrapping it entirely is the answer. Dylan and Hayden take this one seriously rather than just nodding along.

And following on from a recent video arguing that memorising specific facts is pointless, a listener pushes back properly. Is there still a case for children holding knowledge in their heads? Where is the line between rote learning that builds genuine understanding and rote learning that is just performance? Dylan and Hayden try to draw it.

Four great questions, four proper answers.

🎧 New episodes every week. Leave us a review if you enjoy the show!

🔢 Want to boost maths fluency in your school? Book a free Maths Zoo trial at www.mathszoo.org

💬 Join our completely free WhatsApp community and connect with teachers from across the UK: https://chat.whatsapp.com/HB7n1PNGdGL5STACssEH1s

1
00:00:00,040 --> 00:00:02,080
Hello everyone, Welcome back to
another episode of TC Repeat.

2
00:00:02,080 --> 00:00:03,920
My name is Dylan and my name's
Hayden, and we're back with

3
00:00:03,920 --> 00:00:06,240
another question and answer.
You lovely listeners have been

4
00:00:06,240 --> 00:00:08,000
writing in to us.
You can join our WhatsApp

5
00:00:08,000 --> 00:00:10,360
community down in the
description below.

6
00:00:10,840 --> 00:00:13,600
Let's get cracking.
First one, Hayden.

7
00:00:14,440 --> 00:00:16,440
Go on.
Oh, you're so kind.

8
00:00:16,560 --> 00:00:18,440
He's such a sweetie.
I'm so nice.

9
00:00:18,440 --> 00:00:21,400
Following on from a recent video
you did about learning specific

10
00:00:21,400 --> 00:00:24,840
facts being pointless, what what
room do you think there is for

11
00:00:24,840 --> 00:00:26,320
children memorising facts at
all?

12
00:00:26,640 --> 00:00:28,840
Where is the line?
Is it all completely pointless

13
00:00:28,840 --> 00:00:30,800
now that there is so much
information at our fingertips,

14
00:00:30,800 --> 00:00:33,080
or is there still a case for
remembering things?

15
00:00:33,680 --> 00:00:36,560
Yes, of course there is.
That's not what I meant.

16
00:00:36,680 --> 00:00:38,840
We're seeing a lot.
Maybe it's because it kind of

17
00:00:38,840 --> 00:00:41,880
highlights maybe I'm being quite
divisive sometimes when I do

18
00:00:41,880 --> 00:00:46,280
these maybe or a little bit.
What's the word provocative?

19
00:00:46,280 --> 00:00:49,880
Perhaps because like, I, I feel
like it's quite clear that's not

20
00:00:49,880 --> 00:00:51,920
what I meant.
Like I didn't remotely say let's

21
00:00:51,920 --> 00:00:53,400
not learn anything absolutely
ever.

22
00:00:53,640 --> 00:00:56,640
My actual wording was specific
facts.

23
00:00:56,640 --> 00:00:58,920
And my example was, for example,
in history.

24
00:00:59,360 --> 00:01:02,640
Do I really, really care if at
the end of a unit, a child can't

25
00:01:02,640 --> 00:01:05,080
tell me the exact year that
Tutankhamun's tomb was

26
00:01:05,080 --> 00:01:05,760
discovered?
Right.

27
00:01:06,200 --> 00:01:10,760
And my point there is I think
that kind of level of we must

28
00:01:10,760 --> 00:01:12,480
learn all of the facts and the
things.

29
00:01:12,480 --> 00:01:15,080
And then next lesson, I'm going
to start with a bit of a recap

30
00:01:15,080 --> 00:01:17,600
on the exact facts and see if
you remember them or not.

31
00:01:18,560 --> 00:01:21,160
It's a nice thing to do.
But like then then I've heard of

32
00:01:21,160 --> 00:01:24,440
schools being told check the
gaps for those mini retrieval

33
00:01:24,440 --> 00:01:25,760
tests and make sure you fill
them.

34
00:01:25,760 --> 00:01:27,320
No, Yeah, yeah, yeah.
No.

35
00:01:27,440 --> 00:01:28,840
What a waste of time.
I don't care.

36
00:01:28,840 --> 00:01:30,720
No, it's not.
It's not remotely necessary.

37
00:01:30,720 --> 00:01:32,960
So I'm just trying to clarify
where I was.

38
00:01:33,240 --> 00:01:36,480
There are some specific facts
that, because of the advent, I

39
00:01:36,480 --> 00:01:39,080
think, and the dawn of more
technology than ever before,

40
00:01:39,280 --> 00:01:40,840
become less important for
children.

41
00:01:40,840 --> 00:01:43,840
Do you find it particularly
weird, like in that situation

42
00:01:43,840 --> 00:01:46,000
you just gave there over
history, for example, Is it

43
00:01:46,000 --> 00:01:49,440
because there are so many facts
about everything?

44
00:01:49,680 --> 00:01:53,080
Yeah, maybe that it's weird to
put on a pedestal to that to the

45
00:01:53,080 --> 00:01:55,120
NTH degree of light to the point
we have to then do retrieval

46
00:01:55,120 --> 00:01:58,120
tasks the next day to make sure
they remembered these strange

47
00:01:58,120 --> 00:02:00,960
subset are very specific facts.
Is that is that the reason that

48
00:02:00,960 --> 00:02:02,800
you find it?
Essentially, yeah, I think maybe

49
00:02:02,800 --> 00:02:04,080
it was.
It's rooting the fact I did a

50
00:02:04,080 --> 00:02:06,600
history degree and for a long
time people were half joking and

51
00:02:06,600 --> 00:02:09,759
half serious when they would ask
me what happened in like 1347.

52
00:02:10,199 --> 00:02:11,280
I'm like, well, I actually don't
know.

53
00:02:11,280 --> 00:02:15,240
This isn't the the the actual,
you know, what skills require

54
00:02:15,240 --> 00:02:18,680
someone to be a good historian
aren't rooted in knowing all the

55
00:02:18,680 --> 00:02:20,920
facts, but it's a good thing to
know all your facts.

56
00:02:20,920 --> 00:02:22,960
It's important.
I listen to the rest is history

57
00:02:22,960 --> 00:02:25,160
podcast.
Dominic Sambrook and Tom Holland

58
00:02:25,280 --> 00:02:27,680
know their facts, right?
They know them and it's really

59
00:02:27,680 --> 00:02:29,960
helpful when they're putting
together this kind of narrative

60
00:02:29,960 --> 00:02:32,320
and this story.
It helps that they have it off

61
00:02:32,320 --> 00:02:34,800
the top of the head because it
makes the presentation better.

62
00:02:34,800 --> 00:02:36,400
Of course it does.
And it makes like what you're

63
00:02:36,400 --> 00:02:38,000
talking about.
It's rooted more in that you

64
00:02:38,000 --> 00:02:39,360
know what's going on.
So then you're going to

65
00:02:39,360 --> 00:02:41,360
interpret it maybe, and you have
you understand where the facts

66
00:02:41,360 --> 00:02:43,240
came from, etcetera.
So I'm not saying it's a bad

67
00:02:43,240 --> 00:02:45,800
thing, but yeah, I agree.
It's like we've decided where

68
00:02:45,800 --> 00:02:48,480
this arbitrary line is, where it
matters what individual facts,

69
00:02:48,480 --> 00:02:50,280
you know, And it just happens to
be the facts that I've chosen

70
00:02:50,280 --> 00:02:52,560
for this lesson.
I could have chosen 10 more

71
00:02:52,560 --> 00:02:53,480
facts.
Do you know what I mean?

72
00:02:53,680 --> 00:02:56,360
I could have chosen the fact.
Where did Lord Carnarvon travel

73
00:02:56,360 --> 00:02:57,880
from when he went to Egypt to
find this?

74
00:02:57,880 --> 00:02:59,320
Like where did his money come
from?

75
00:02:59,320 --> 00:03:02,800
Like, OK, it's, it's some like
at some point it doesn't matter

76
00:03:02,800 --> 00:03:05,840
anymore.
But I, I do genuinely also think

77
00:03:05,840 --> 00:03:09,440
that when it comes to knowing
facts, facts and knowing things,

78
00:03:09,840 --> 00:03:11,720
then yeah, of course it's still
a good thing to do.

79
00:03:11,720 --> 00:03:14,280
And even within history, we
still have to understand

80
00:03:14,280 --> 00:03:16,040
chronology.
I think children should still

81
00:03:16,040 --> 00:03:18,480
understand the order in which
things happen and why there's a

82
00:03:18,480 --> 00:03:20,160
cause and effect.
Maybe that's gone through

83
00:03:20,160 --> 00:03:22,400
history and and in different
interpretations of what have

84
00:03:22,400 --> 00:03:25,440
happened and when the fact
something happened before

85
00:03:25,440 --> 00:03:26,840
something else is clearly
important.

86
00:03:27,400 --> 00:03:30,440
That's that that that you are
required to understand that in

87
00:03:30,440 --> 00:03:32,280
order to have a good
chronological base and a good

88
00:03:32,280 --> 00:03:34,040
understanding of why things
happened.

89
00:03:34,360 --> 00:03:36,160
So I'm not I'm not against
knowing facts.

90
00:03:36,160 --> 00:03:38,600
I was very specifically talking
about really specific intricate

91
00:03:38,600 --> 00:03:40,360
facts that at the end of the
unit.

92
00:03:40,360 --> 00:03:43,240
I don't necessarily think I
failed as a teacher if every

93
00:03:43,240 --> 00:03:45,320
child doesn't remember.
Yeah, but I think there's some

94
00:03:45,320 --> 00:03:47,480
more broader things and and
there's a whole discussion we

95
00:03:47,480 --> 00:03:49,280
can have about working memory,
right.

96
00:03:49,280 --> 00:03:53,200
And I know we've had this before
where we've talked about how if

97
00:03:53,200 --> 00:03:56,840
you learn certain things, that
could be a process in maths.

98
00:03:57,040 --> 00:03:59,040
But also I'm thinking about
mathics.

99
00:03:59,040 --> 00:04:01,120
It's where, you know, our our
passion lies.

100
00:04:01,520 --> 00:04:03,120
You need to know things.
Yeah.

101
00:04:03,120 --> 00:04:05,640
You need children need to know.
To make the connections.

102
00:04:05,640 --> 00:04:08,840
There, there is 10 millimetres
in a centimetre, yeah, you need

103
00:04:08,840 --> 00:04:12,440
to know that there are 10,
sorry, 100 centimetres in a

104
00:04:12,440 --> 00:04:14,400
metre.
And we can come up with

105
00:04:14,400 --> 00:04:16,760
different ways of children
working out and why and what

106
00:04:16,760 --> 00:04:18,680
milli means.
And there's 1000 in a metre or

107
00:04:18,680 --> 00:04:21,360
what centi means that you can
kind of work out, but you still

108
00:04:21,360 --> 00:04:24,320
need to know what senti means.
But at some point it requires

109
00:04:24,320 --> 00:04:27,200
you to understand a fact, which
then if you know these facts,

110
00:04:27,200 --> 00:04:29,480
think about times tables,
division facts, all this kind of

111
00:04:29,480 --> 00:04:32,320
stuff, number bonds.
We want children to know them as

112
00:04:32,320 --> 00:04:35,280
facts, to record them because it
frees up your working memory.

113
00:04:35,440 --> 00:04:37,080
So I don't think there's a
contradiction here.

114
00:04:37,080 --> 00:04:40,360
I think there's different levels
of facts and what we can say is

115
00:04:40,360 --> 00:04:41,880
important for children to
understand.

116
00:04:41,880 --> 00:04:43,440
Sure.
I guess the difference is I'm

117
00:04:43,440 --> 00:04:45,040
really thinking more deep about
this now because I definitely

118
00:04:45,040 --> 00:04:48,160
used to fall into the trap of
being like, oh, in the modern

119
00:04:48,160 --> 00:04:49,680
day, like we've got Google at
our fingertips.

120
00:04:49,680 --> 00:04:50,880
We don't need to to learn
anything.

121
00:04:51,120 --> 00:04:52,560
We can just find out.
But you're right though, because

122
00:04:52,560 --> 00:04:55,240
we gave the analogy even about
this is still quite niche.

123
00:04:55,240 --> 00:04:58,240
But even in the example of the
rest is history, imagine,

124
00:04:58,320 --> 00:05:00,640
imagine if they didn't know
anything, but they were just

125
00:05:00,640 --> 00:05:02,320
really good historians.
They're really good skill set,

126
00:05:02,320 --> 00:05:03,680
but they didn't remember any
facts ever.

127
00:05:03,680 --> 00:05:05,880
Like it would be boring because
they'd be constantly looking

128
00:05:05,880 --> 00:05:07,640
things up and they wouldn't be
able to innately make those

129
00:05:07,640 --> 00:05:10,040
connections and links through
their vast understanding of

130
00:05:10,040 --> 00:05:11,800
history.
Like that's obviously important,

131
00:05:12,000 --> 00:05:15,800
but in maths like the same so
that the argument I was thinking

132
00:05:15,800 --> 00:05:18,200
of in my head regarding history
was I have a problem.

133
00:05:18,200 --> 00:05:20,120
I think you're, I think it's
what you're trying to say.

134
00:05:20,120 --> 00:05:23,040
I have a problem with the fact
that we pick a a very specific

135
00:05:23,040 --> 00:05:26,480
subset of facts and we determine
their progress and attainment

136
00:05:26,480 --> 00:05:29,800
based on those exact facts, when
really we should just be saying

137
00:05:29,960 --> 00:05:31,840
it.
Having understanding things and

138
00:05:31,840 --> 00:05:33,320
having facts and knowledge is
good.

139
00:05:33,520 --> 00:05:36,360
But I don't want to be in a
system where that child who's

140
00:05:36,360 --> 00:05:40,560
learned 57 facts about ancient
Greece, but happened to be none

141
00:05:40,560 --> 00:05:42,760
of the 12 facts that we learn in
our lesson is now determined

142
00:05:42,760 --> 00:05:44,600
worse at the child that just
learn those 12 facts.

143
00:05:44,800 --> 00:05:46,720
Like, I don't like the fact that
that can exist, which is

144
00:05:46,720 --> 00:05:47,680
basically what's happening,
right?

145
00:05:48,000 --> 00:05:50,440
Whereas in maths, I don't think
it's quite the same because the

146
00:05:50,520 --> 00:05:55,880
curriculum, so it's so broken
down and structured where it's

147
00:05:55,880 --> 00:05:59,240
sort of like there kind of is a
specific subset of facts that

148
00:05:59,240 --> 00:06:01,320
you need to learn.
And they and they are, they are

149
00:06:01,320 --> 00:06:02,800
important.
And there probably are some more

150
00:06:02,800 --> 00:06:05,600
fringe facts you can learn as
well that OK, might fall into

151
00:06:05,600 --> 00:06:07,880
analogy of or you're not going
to get extra Marks and you're a

152
00:06:07,880 --> 00:06:09,600
test that determines your
attainment.

153
00:06:09,960 --> 00:06:12,000
But there is there is a really
core set of facts.

154
00:06:12,000 --> 00:06:14,440
You do, you do just need to know
what is how to define a square,

155
00:06:14,440 --> 00:06:15,960
how many sides are in a pen?
Yeah, exactly.

156
00:06:15,960 --> 00:06:17,680
You do kind of have to be able
to do those things.

157
00:06:17,680 --> 00:06:18,880
You need to know what perimeter
means.

158
00:06:18,880 --> 00:06:19,920
Yeah.
But you just have to, yeah.

159
00:06:20,360 --> 00:06:22,120
And I still do think there's a
grey line, right?

160
00:06:22,200 --> 00:06:25,520
There is a grey line eventually,
like you could start to argue

161
00:06:25,520 --> 00:06:29,520
things like, you know, and I
think at what age as well.

162
00:06:29,520 --> 00:06:32,720
That's also important, like days
of the week, clearly important

163
00:06:32,720 --> 00:06:34,600
to know, right.
How many hours are in a day?

164
00:06:34,600 --> 00:06:36,400
Clearly important to know.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.

165
00:06:36,400 --> 00:06:39,480
Is it vital that children
understand what pie is like?

166
00:06:40,520 --> 00:06:42,840
But you, you could.
My point is you can start to

167
00:06:42,840 --> 00:06:45,920
argue that it may be stretching
into the point of, well, well, I

168
00:06:45,920 --> 00:06:48,000
don't think you need to know
that in order to have a good

169
00:06:48,000 --> 00:06:50,200
base understanding of maths.
But you do need to have a good

170
00:06:50,200 --> 00:06:52,840
understanding of π if you want
to go into that field of

171
00:06:52,840 --> 00:06:55,120
learning about circles, if you
want to go into that field of

172
00:06:55,120 --> 00:06:57,360
solving problems in that area.
So I think it's the same of

173
00:06:57,360 --> 00:06:59,120
history, right?
I think if you're going to

174
00:06:59,120 --> 00:07:01,760
become a specialist when you're
like, if it becomes your job

175
00:07:01,760 --> 00:07:03,560
that you're a, you're an ancient
Greece specialist.

176
00:07:03,960 --> 00:07:05,080
Yeah.
Actually, do you know what you

177
00:07:05,080 --> 00:07:06,440
do need to know those facts at
that point.

178
00:07:06,720 --> 00:07:09,640
So what I'm saying is just
stripping it back to the context

179
00:07:09,640 --> 00:07:12,560
of being in a classroom with
Year 4 doing a history lesson.

180
00:07:13,160 --> 00:07:16,240
We could have chosen a number of
different points in history,

181
00:07:16,720 --> 00:07:17,320
right?
Yeah.

182
00:07:17,320 --> 00:07:18,960
We we could have chosen a
different point in history.

183
00:07:18,960 --> 00:07:21,040
The curriculum could have said
actually learn about this time

184
00:07:21,640 --> 00:07:23,520
and children would learn only
facts about that.

185
00:07:23,760 --> 00:07:26,120
And in that scenario, they
wouldn't know any facts about

186
00:07:26,120 --> 00:07:28,400
ancient Greece.
We could still determine that

187
00:07:28,400 --> 00:07:29,680
they're good historians though,
couldn't we?

188
00:07:30,080 --> 00:07:32,920
And I think that goes to show
that it's not necessarily about

189
00:07:32,920 --> 00:07:35,640
the facts you remember and the
specific things that determine

190
00:07:35,640 --> 00:07:38,520
how good a historian you are.
It's the things we can do cross

191
00:07:38,520 --> 00:07:40,680
topic.
So whether I'm doing, you know,

192
00:07:40,680 --> 00:07:43,240
ancient, you know, ancient China
or whether I'm doing ancient

193
00:07:43,240 --> 00:07:46,680
Greece or whether I'm doing is
something from South America or

194
00:07:46,680 --> 00:07:50,200
I'm doing World War 2.
The specific facts themselves I

195
00:07:50,200 --> 00:07:52,800
don't think necessarily mean
that and a better historian, but

196
00:07:52,800 --> 00:07:55,040
I could absolutely draw lines
across them.

197
00:07:55,040 --> 00:07:57,880
All of do you understand how
civilization came about?

198
00:07:58,040 --> 00:08:00,160
Do you understand cause and
effect in that situation?

199
00:08:00,280 --> 00:08:01,880
Do you know the chronology of
that time?

200
00:08:02,040 --> 00:08:04,240
Do you know the social factors,
what's going on with people at

201
00:08:04,240 --> 00:08:06,400
home when war was raging?
Do you know about invasion?

202
00:08:06,400 --> 00:08:08,080
Do you know about the borders
changing?

203
00:08:08,240 --> 00:08:11,520
All of those things can be
crossed no matter what you do in

204
00:08:11,520 --> 00:08:14,120
history.
That I think I'm much more of a

205
00:08:14,120 --> 00:08:16,600
good indication of whether a
child is better at history or

206
00:08:16,600 --> 00:08:19,200
not than simply saying to them,
oh, OK, actually, what year did

207
00:08:19,200 --> 00:08:21,720
that happen?
I think it's just not is

208
00:08:21,720 --> 00:08:24,040
important.
And I think there's other ways

209
00:08:24,040 --> 00:08:26,000
that are still vital.
Obviously, we can still judge

210
00:08:26,000 --> 00:08:28,400
children.
And when I say judge them, I

211
00:08:28,400 --> 00:08:30,800
mean we can see how much
historical skill they've picked

212
00:08:30,800 --> 00:08:33,159
up.
Yeah, I personally think without

213
00:08:33,159 --> 00:08:36,080
being hung up on, well, retrieve
this fact, please.

214
00:08:36,080 --> 00:08:37,080
I just don't think it's
important.

215
00:08:37,080 --> 00:08:37,760
Yeah, I agree.
I agree.

216
00:08:37,760 --> 00:08:40,080
I think that's it, isn't it?
It's not all or nothing in any

217
00:08:40,080 --> 00:08:42,360
of these situations.
The facts are obviously

218
00:08:42,360 --> 00:08:43,320
important.
If we're measuring the

219
00:08:43,320 --> 00:08:45,720
attainment of children in
history, it's going to be based

220
00:08:45,720 --> 00:08:47,160
on those skills.
And ultimately, like, I actually

221
00:08:47,160 --> 00:08:49,200
do think that's what the
curriculum is aimed to do.

222
00:08:49,200 --> 00:08:49,560
Yeah.
Yeah.

223
00:08:49,560 --> 00:08:51,720
Like when you when you actually
read the curriculum for history.

224
00:08:52,000 --> 00:08:53,880
It doesn't say learn when
Tutankhamun's school was

225
00:08:53,880 --> 00:08:54,800
discovered, does it?
Exactly.

226
00:08:54,960 --> 00:08:57,240
It doesn't say all four lines of
the curriculum, right?

227
00:08:57,320 --> 00:09:00,640
But and even when we had Ofsted
and they looked into history, it

228
00:09:00,640 --> 00:09:03,120
was very much about the skills.
That's what they were interested

229
00:09:03,120 --> 00:09:05,360
in innately.
So yeah, it's just a case of if

230
00:09:05,360 --> 00:09:07,280
schools are a bit, they can
become a bit too obsessed.

231
00:09:07,280 --> 00:09:10,160
I think of the facts as if like
that's the be on end or not.

232
00:09:10,160 --> 00:09:12,880
The skills like, yeah, they're
important, but ultimately it's

233
00:09:12,880 --> 00:09:15,000
for this wider lens that you
talked about. 100% And I think

234
00:09:15,000 --> 00:09:18,480
just one thing to say absolutely
it's this is not us saying that

235
00:09:18,480 --> 00:09:20,960
it's not a thing that if you
learn facts, your working memory

236
00:09:20,960 --> 00:09:23,080
is is increased.
OK.

237
00:09:23,320 --> 00:09:26,080
I think that the comparison with
different subjects is different

238
00:09:26,080 --> 00:09:28,720
Now I think with maths, if you
have a really good understanding

239
00:09:28,720 --> 00:09:30,760
of the process and what's going
on, that frees up your working

240
00:09:30,760 --> 00:09:31,840
memory.
If you have a really good

241
00:09:31,840 --> 00:09:34,440
understanding of your time
stable facts, you can focus more

242
00:09:34,440 --> 00:09:36,960
of your attention on actually
solving that equivalent fraction

243
00:09:36,960 --> 00:09:39,440
question because you're not
thinking how do I times by 4,

244
00:09:39,440 --> 00:09:41,720
you just know it.
So there is definitely a benefit

245
00:09:41,720 --> 00:09:43,320
to knowing facts in certain
situations.

246
00:09:43,520 --> 00:09:46,200
I just think that we can calm
down a bit and the situation

247
00:09:46,200 --> 00:09:49,000
that we're in depends on how
important that fact is. 100%

248
00:09:49,280 --> 00:09:50,640
Nice one let's go to the next
one.

249
00:09:51,040 --> 00:09:54,240
I've got a parent who emails me
at at 10:00 PM most nights and

250
00:09:54,240 --> 00:09:56,440
expects a reply before school
the next morning.

251
00:09:56,560 --> 00:09:58,480
Sounds like you got a bit of a
tough mum and dad.

252
00:10:00,480 --> 00:10:02,600
You're a grown adult, why are
your parents messing you?

253
00:10:03,040 --> 00:10:05,800
That is banter that is funny.
My SOT have basically told me

254
00:10:05,800 --> 00:10:08,400
just to manage the relationship.
What would you actually do?

255
00:10:09,680 --> 00:10:12,240
I mean in a way I'd do that and
my managing the relationship

256
00:10:12,240 --> 00:10:15,280
would be not replying at any
time outside of work hours.

257
00:10:15,280 --> 00:10:17,560
And then I'd tell my SOT cheers
for that advice, here's what

258
00:10:17,560 --> 00:10:20,560
I've done, I've managed it.
And if they don't like that?

259
00:10:21,520 --> 00:10:23,680
Just a quick one.
I've had that mum call back, you

260
00:10:23,680 --> 00:10:25,720
know, you mentioned the other
day you asked what should I do

261
00:10:26,120 --> 00:10:28,360
and I said you should manage a
relationship or they have

262
00:10:28,360 --> 00:10:31,120
messaged me and said that you're
not actually replying to them

263
00:10:31,120 --> 00:10:34,480
within 12 hours.
Well, they're messaging me at

264
00:10:34,480 --> 00:10:36,800
10:00 PM, mate.
But did you manage that

265
00:10:36,800 --> 00:10:38,600
relationship?
Yeah, yeah, I did manage it.

266
00:10:38,600 --> 00:10:41,160
I I told them I'm not gonna
reply outside of work hours.

267
00:10:41,680 --> 00:10:43,040
It's funny, 'cause you didn't
ask me for anymore.

268
00:10:43,040 --> 00:10:45,440
You don't give me any advice, so
I presumed that you'd be OK with

269
00:10:45,440 --> 00:10:46,800
me sorting this situation
myself.

270
00:10:46,840 --> 00:10:49,320
Yeah, what I kind of hoped would
happen there if I gave you some

271
00:10:49,320 --> 00:10:52,880
vague kind of just mersh that
something doesn't really make

272
00:10:52,880 --> 00:10:54,280
any sense.
I was kind of hoping you would

273
00:10:54,280 --> 00:10:56,200
just do all the stuff I can't
actually ask you to do, which is

274
00:10:56,200 --> 00:10:58,000
to work outside of those.
Times so I.

275
00:10:58,320 --> 00:10:59,800
Was kind of hoping that I could
exploit you.

276
00:11:00,200 --> 00:11:02,520
Why, why, Why did you not let me
exploit you?

277
00:11:02,680 --> 00:11:04,880
I see, I see.
So I read it in the lines here.

278
00:11:04,880 --> 00:11:06,400
When you said manage the
relationship, what you were

279
00:11:06,400 --> 00:11:08,160
saying to me was just reply to
the do.

280
00:11:08,160 --> 00:11:10,160
Everything that I can't actually
tell you to do just against your

281
00:11:10,160 --> 00:11:12,360
contract, but I fully expect you
to just to be replying.

282
00:11:12,360 --> 00:11:13,520
OK, we're now telling me to do
that, aren't.

283
00:11:13,520 --> 00:11:15,880
You No, no, I'm saying no, I'm.
But it's hypothetical, isn't it?

284
00:11:18,480 --> 00:11:21,800
Layers of hypothetically right
here, yeah, I just, yeah.

285
00:11:22,160 --> 00:11:24,600
But OK, OK, OK.
I'm just gonna narrow it back

286
00:11:24,600 --> 00:11:26,680
down again and we can joke and
laugh about how it's just

287
00:11:26,680 --> 00:11:28,440
absolutely ridiculous what we're
talking about here.

288
00:11:28,440 --> 00:11:31,440
Obviously you shouldn't be OK,
but if your SLT do genuinely

289
00:11:31,440 --> 00:11:32,800
just expect you to just deal
with it.

290
00:11:33,040 --> 00:11:35,200
Yeah.
And that does happen.

291
00:11:35,200 --> 00:11:38,880
They're like, Oh yeah, well,
kind of just got to do it.

292
00:11:38,880 --> 00:11:41,840
Yeah.
My advice is don't just don't do

293
00:11:41,840 --> 00:11:42,880
it.
And, and we've said this a

294
00:11:42,880 --> 00:11:44,640
million times, we're gonna risk
repeating ourselves over and

295
00:11:44,640 --> 00:11:46,640
over again.
If you're in that situation,

296
00:11:47,040 --> 00:11:49,400
don't bow to it because then it
becomes normal.

297
00:11:49,760 --> 00:11:52,440
Think about not only you, if
you're someone who, OK, here's

298
00:11:52,440 --> 00:11:55,640
here's, here's the crux of it.
If you're someone who can't put

299
00:11:55,640 --> 00:11:59,280
yourself on a pedestal and and
respect yourself enough to say

300
00:11:59,280 --> 00:12:01,960
no to that in terms of you're
thinking, oh, I'll just do it,

301
00:12:01,960 --> 00:12:03,560
It's only me.
Yeah, it's only me.

302
00:12:03,560 --> 00:12:05,840
But this is see a lot of this in
teaching where it's like, oh,

303
00:12:05,880 --> 00:12:06,920
I'll do that.
It's just me.

304
00:12:07,200 --> 00:12:08,960
But even they'll fight for other
people as well.

305
00:12:08,960 --> 00:12:09,960
And they'll be like, no, it's
not fair.

306
00:12:09,960 --> 00:12:11,160
It's not fair.
I'll do it, I'll do it.

307
00:12:11,200 --> 00:12:12,720
Yeah.
Think to yourself then in this

308
00:12:12,720 --> 00:12:14,840
situation, if that's you, and
you'll just justify yourself

309
00:12:14,840 --> 00:12:16,800
doing this because you're
thinking, oh, it's just me.

310
00:12:17,240 --> 00:12:19,040
Think about how it's going to
have the effect on the next

311
00:12:19,040 --> 00:12:20,960
person this happens to.
Because the next person this

312
00:12:20,960 --> 00:12:23,120
happens to SLT will not only
just be able to say, manage your

313
00:12:23,120 --> 00:12:25,520
relationship, they'll say, oh,
yeah, this happens quite a bit,

314
00:12:25,520 --> 00:12:27,040
actually.
And they just reply, yeah.

315
00:12:27,280 --> 00:12:29,000
So you become the enabler in a
way.

316
00:12:29,000 --> 00:12:29,600
Yeah.
So true.

317
00:12:29,760 --> 00:12:32,760
If you're, if you're not, if
you're not able to put yourself

318
00:12:32,760 --> 00:12:34,680
in a pedestal for whatever
reason, it might be justified or

319
00:12:34,680 --> 00:12:37,120
not to think I'm going to look
after myself and say no.

320
00:12:37,680 --> 00:12:39,840
Now let's put it in the lens of
how it might affect other

321
00:12:39,840 --> 00:12:41,080
people.
Yeah, I'm actually in the next

322
00:12:41,080 --> 00:12:43,200
class teacher exactly that.
They're doing the same thing

323
00:12:43,200 --> 00:12:44,840
next year, right?
Or the last teacher applied

324
00:12:44,840 --> 00:12:46,760
whenever this teacher is
rubbish, going straight to the

325
00:12:46,760 --> 00:12:48,080
head teacher.
The last teacher did all these

326
00:12:48,080 --> 00:12:50,480
things, it becomes a new normal
and it was already absurd.

327
00:12:50,680 --> 00:12:53,320
And this teacher, now I have to
wait 24 hours, sometimes 48

328
00:12:53,320 --> 00:12:55,240
hours to get a reply and it's
always within school time.

329
00:12:55,240 --> 00:12:58,400
I'm at work.
Exactly, exactly.

330
00:12:58,960 --> 00:13:02,720
So that one to me just, it just
strikes me as I think in

331
00:13:02,720 --> 00:13:06,880
general, what do you think about
schools that give out work

332
00:13:06,880 --> 00:13:08,480
e-mail addresses like on their
website?

333
00:13:08,480 --> 00:13:10,680
And like, it's because obviously
we worked in school that did

334
00:13:10,680 --> 00:13:12,080
both.
It's just for people listening.

335
00:13:12,480 --> 00:13:15,720
And it does seem like a bit of a
split where if you're in a

336
00:13:15,720 --> 00:13:18,400
school where your e-mail address
is just public knowledge, it's

337
00:13:18,400 --> 00:13:20,200
on the website.
Parents can just e-mail you

338
00:13:20,200 --> 00:13:23,200
directly.
A lot of teachers have heard me

339
00:13:23,200 --> 00:13:26,480
say, well, in my most recent
school that that didn't happen.

340
00:13:26,480 --> 00:13:28,120
Everything came through the
office, everything came through

341
00:13:28,120 --> 00:13:29,520
SLT.
And they're like shocked.

342
00:13:29,760 --> 00:13:31,240
They're like, what?
How do you do this?

343
00:13:31,240 --> 00:13:34,160
And we're like, we don't.
And they can't fathom that

344
00:13:34,160 --> 00:13:35,600
there's a world where you don't
have to do.

345
00:13:35,600 --> 00:13:37,640
That I couldn't, to be fair when
we started because obviously I'd

346
00:13:37,640 --> 00:13:39,760
come from a school where they
have Direct Line team and we

347
00:13:39,760 --> 00:13:40,880
were getting emailed all the
time.

348
00:13:41,040 --> 00:13:43,320
I think there's a middle ground.
I used to be very, I think I

349
00:13:43,320 --> 00:13:46,600
used to be quite quick to say or
the way our new school does it

350
00:13:46,600 --> 00:13:48,120
is is the best and only way to
do it.

351
00:13:48,120 --> 00:13:49,880
Like no school ever should be
given out direct emails.

352
00:13:49,880 --> 00:13:52,440
And I do genuinely think that's
the case probably for most

353
00:13:52,440 --> 00:13:54,800
schools.
There is probably a middle

354
00:13:54,800 --> 00:13:59,400
ground where a school that's
well run and well managed, with

355
00:13:59,400 --> 00:14:02,720
really clear policies and strict
boundaries in place, could have

356
00:14:02,720 --> 00:14:06,600
a system where parents and
teachers can e-mail directly and

357
00:14:06,600 --> 00:14:07,920
it doesn't actually become.
Horribly.

358
00:14:07,920 --> 00:14:08,880
Well, that looks like a.
Burden.

359
00:14:08,880 --> 00:14:12,400
I think it would just have to be
some sort of either some really

360
00:14:12,400 --> 00:14:14,280
strict policies towards the
parents that are upheld in terms

361
00:14:14,280 --> 00:14:19,120
of you will not get a reply
between certain hours or you

362
00:14:19,120 --> 00:14:22,000
have to, you know you can expect
to wait at least 48 hours before

363
00:14:22,000 --> 00:14:23,280
you get a reply.
You still got a replacement.

364
00:14:23,280 --> 00:14:25,160
At some point, yeah, of course
you can of course, of course and

365
00:14:25,160 --> 00:14:27,360
it will have to be done in in
school time because I because

366
00:14:27,360 --> 00:14:29,280
the way I imagine it is those
but.

367
00:14:29,880 --> 00:14:31,640
It's just a job you're adding
on, it doesn't matter when it

368
00:14:31,640 --> 00:14:33,040
happens.
It's true, but someone's going

369
00:14:33,040 --> 00:14:34,440
to do it.
It's a job that someone's going

370
00:14:34,440 --> 00:14:37,280
to take on.
Either the SLT are forgoing some

371
00:14:37,280 --> 00:14:39,480
part of their role and taking on
all of the burden of all their

372
00:14:39,480 --> 00:14:41,920
teachers, or the teachers are
taking on the individual burdens

373
00:14:41,920 --> 00:14:43,840
themselves, or the office are
taking on the entire burden.

374
00:14:44,040 --> 00:14:45,960
All those conversations are just
pushed to conversations you have

375
00:14:45,960 --> 00:14:47,320
at the end of the day anyway,
with parents at the.

376
00:14:47,320 --> 00:14:48,200
Door.
Yeah, that's a good point.

377
00:14:48,200 --> 00:14:49,440
So it's like it's going to
happen anyway.

378
00:14:49,600 --> 00:14:52,720
Did you not find though with
that policy where parents didn't

379
00:14:52,720 --> 00:14:55,400
have the e-mail, what it ended
up doing was actually just

380
00:14:55,400 --> 00:14:56,640
reduced them to the sheer
number.

381
00:14:56,720 --> 00:14:58,960
So it's not a case of
necessarily like think of all

382
00:14:58,960 --> 00:15:01,240
the emails individual staff
would have got and now my SRT

383
00:15:01,240 --> 00:15:03,200
has got them all.
Actually, I think it reduced it

384
00:15:03,200 --> 00:15:05,520
massively.
I still think SRT and the office

385
00:15:05,520 --> 00:15:08,480
staff and our old absorbed way
more than we thought and then

386
00:15:08,480 --> 00:15:10,640
kind of sorted it.
But their, their whole policy

387
00:15:10,640 --> 00:15:13,200
was if they can nip it in the
bud, like, OK, 90% of these

388
00:15:13,200 --> 00:15:14,720
things aren't needed for the
class Teacher.

389
00:15:14,920 --> 00:15:17,400
This is just someone asking what
do we wear shorts tomorrow?

390
00:15:17,560 --> 00:15:20,400
I'm sorry, as a teacher, don't
message me now, don't e-mail me.

391
00:15:20,400 --> 00:15:21,320
I don't care if there's a
policy.

392
00:15:21,320 --> 00:15:22,480
I don't need to reply in two
days.

393
00:15:22,480 --> 00:15:24,320
You shouldn't be in my inbox.
It's pointless.

394
00:15:24,520 --> 00:15:27,840
So it kind of that that all your
points were really valid.

395
00:15:27,840 --> 00:15:29,240
Absolutely.
And I think someone does have to

396
00:15:29,240 --> 00:15:31,800
take on the burden at some point
and we're just sharing it

397
00:15:31,800 --> 00:15:33,000
around.
But I do think that burden is

398
00:15:33,000 --> 00:15:37,720
reduced and I do also think that
it it kind of, it allowed our

399
00:15:37,720 --> 00:15:40,600
leadership actually, if
anything, they had a really good

400
00:15:40,600 --> 00:15:42,360
relationship with parents in
high school, didn't they?

401
00:15:42,360 --> 00:15:44,160
It was really strong and I think
that might be why.

402
00:15:44,200 --> 00:15:45,640
You're right, actually.
And that's, that's something

403
00:15:45,640 --> 00:15:48,000
that I don't take into account
as much as I should, which is

404
00:15:48,000 --> 00:15:52,000
how many of the emails that went
through the first layer SLT and

405
00:15:52,000 --> 00:15:53,440
things didn't actually make it
to us anyway.

406
00:15:53,560 --> 00:15:55,560
Because my point before that was
going to be the counter argument

407
00:15:55,560 --> 00:15:57,200
is there's just two steps now.
The e-mail goes to the office

408
00:15:57,200 --> 00:15:58,280
and then they forward it to me
anyway.

409
00:15:58,360 --> 00:15:59,360
They might as well just emailed
me.

410
00:15:59,760 --> 00:16:02,120
But you're right, I definitely
definitely got significantly

411
00:16:02,120 --> 00:16:04,800
fewer emails to me because
things were just absorbed and

412
00:16:04,800 --> 00:16:08,160
sorted by SLT by the office.
I would, I would genuinely say

413
00:16:08,160 --> 00:16:09,640
it'd be interesting.
You're obviously higher up in

414
00:16:09,640 --> 00:16:10,720
the school.
Maybe I don't know if it's more

415
00:16:10,720 --> 00:16:12,960
or less actually, you know, it
seemed to me we were in a Junior

416
00:16:12,960 --> 00:16:14,920
School of Year 3.
When I was in year 3.

417
00:16:14,920 --> 00:16:17,080
I probably had the most
interaction with parents I've

418
00:16:17,080 --> 00:16:18,640
ever had because they were
joining our school, knew they

419
00:16:18,640 --> 00:16:20,040
were young, there was more stuff
going on.

420
00:16:20,520 --> 00:16:21,880
And I wonder if year six it dips
back in.

421
00:16:21,880 --> 00:16:26,360
But when I was in year 4, I can
genuinely say now that in my,

422
00:16:26,680 --> 00:16:29,800
let's just take my last year of
teaching, I reckon I had

423
00:16:30,440 --> 00:16:33,000
probably.
And and this is not including

424
00:16:33,000 --> 00:16:35,920
like the office messaging me,
forwarding me to say someone's

425
00:16:35,920 --> 00:16:37,640
been picked up by someone else.
That's just nothing to me,

426
00:16:37,640 --> 00:16:38,520
right.
That's like, yeah, that's just

427
00:16:38,520 --> 00:16:40,520
information, an actual e-mail.
Yeah, it's just the information

428
00:16:40,520 --> 00:16:43,440
that the the parent has emailed
the school and I need to know

429
00:16:43,440 --> 00:16:45,960
who's picking the child up.
So I'm not counting that actual

430
00:16:45,960 --> 00:16:50,000
emails to me as a teacher.
I reckon it was less than 5.

431
00:16:50,480 --> 00:16:53,360
I was literally thinking like
under. 10 it's honestly like I

432
00:16:53,360 --> 00:16:56,160
can really truly think of, I can
think of two and there's

433
00:16:56,160 --> 00:17:00,160
probably a couple more where it
was like, we've had this e-mail

434
00:17:00,160 --> 00:17:03,080
from a parent have a read and it
was really something quite

435
00:17:03,080 --> 00:17:04,680
specific and it was like,
actually, do you know what?

436
00:17:04,680 --> 00:17:05,839
I should have received this
e-mail.

437
00:17:06,240 --> 00:17:09,160
What I didn't need was what I
had in my old school, which was

438
00:17:09,160 --> 00:17:10,560
people just thinking I was their
mate.

439
00:17:10,680 --> 00:17:12,560
Yeah, like, like when's this
thing?

440
00:17:12,560 --> 00:17:15,040
Sorry, did you do you think to
check the PDF that's on the

441
00:17:15,040 --> 00:17:16,800
website before just emailing me?
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.

442
00:17:16,800 --> 00:17:17,960
Because it'd be information
there.

443
00:17:17,960 --> 00:17:19,760
That's so true.
Just became like a crux, became

444
00:17:19,760 --> 00:17:22,359
like Google 2 point O might as
well have got an e-mail saying

445
00:17:22,359 --> 00:17:24,560
when does Tesco open?
Oh, sorry, let me just double.

446
00:17:24,560 --> 00:17:26,079
Just check.
I don't care.

447
00:17:26,240 --> 00:17:27,319
Look, look, look at for
yourself.

448
00:17:27,319 --> 00:17:29,080
There's a lot of nonsense that
they could have just found out

449
00:17:29,080 --> 00:17:30,200
themselves.
Yeah, it's true.

450
00:17:30,200 --> 00:17:32,640
I think back and it was a big
burden actually.

451
00:17:32,640 --> 00:17:34,800
Yeah, amount of emails had to do
with and some of the sometimes

452
00:17:34,800 --> 00:17:37,120
some parents we'll send an
essay.

453
00:17:37,120 --> 00:17:40,920
I know, I don't know what it is.
TLDR didn't we give me a summary

454
00:17:40,920 --> 00:17:42,280
please?
So it's great about large

455
00:17:42,280 --> 00:17:44,880
language models now straight in.
Can you summarise this please?

456
00:17:45,080 --> 00:17:46,360
I'm not reading this.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.

457
00:17:46,400 --> 00:17:49,880
As long as it's not got any
sensitive, of course.

458
00:17:49,880 --> 00:17:51,680
I'm sorry.
This hypothetical question, this

459
00:17:51,680 --> 00:17:53,840
hypothetical situation is me
having a safeguarding issue

460
00:17:55,200 --> 00:17:56,600
hypothetical.
You're going to get fired from

461
00:17:56,600 --> 00:18:00,400
your job, mate anyway, right?
We've we've diverged.

462
00:18:00,520 --> 00:18:01,480
So yeah.
It was good though.

463
00:18:01,680 --> 00:18:03,760
Yeah good question.
Next one our school does

464
00:18:03,760 --> 00:18:06,400
learning walks without any
notice and then you get a two

465
00:18:06,400 --> 00:18:08,680
line e-mail feedback the same
afternoon with no chance to

466
00:18:08,680 --> 00:18:11,320
respond or discuss.
One week I got told my working

467
00:18:11,320 --> 00:18:14,560
walls were too busy, the next
that they lacked evidence of

468
00:18:14,560 --> 00:18:15,560
learning.
Classic.

469
00:18:16,120 --> 00:18:19,200
How is anyone supposed to win?
Why is feedback so poor?

470
00:18:19,640 --> 00:18:22,720
Do these people go, do they get
training on how to do feedback

471
00:18:22,840 --> 00:18:25,880
or do they just barge themselves
into positions of power and go,

472
00:18:25,880 --> 00:18:27,520
wow, actually, I need to give
you some feedback now.

473
00:18:27,520 --> 00:18:29,200
It's going to be the listing
because it's not even

474
00:18:29,200 --> 00:18:32,240
consistent, complete and utter
nonsense.

475
00:18:32,600 --> 00:18:35,440
I like learning walks, by the
way, Just saying out there, it's

476
00:18:35,440 --> 00:18:39,200
probably an unpopular opinion.
I like learning walks, but it's

477
00:18:39,200 --> 00:18:41,760
it's not what you might think in
your head straight away.

478
00:18:42,040 --> 00:18:44,720
Yeah, because to some people you
say learning walk to me, I'll

479
00:18:44,720 --> 00:18:46,560
just be like, cool, the head's
going around.

480
00:18:47,000 --> 00:18:48,360
Yeah, nice one.
He's a nice bloke.

481
00:18:48,360 --> 00:18:50,040
He'll just come in.
That's that's a learning walk.

482
00:18:50,360 --> 00:18:52,320
And other people think, you
know, four people in suits I've

483
00:18:52,320 --> 00:18:54,600
never seen before.
I've been hired from Ox dead to

484
00:18:54,600 --> 00:18:57,800
come in and actually walk all
over you, walk all over you.

485
00:18:57,800 --> 00:19:00,800
It's just so I think there's a
way to do learning walks without

486
00:19:00,800 --> 00:19:02,720
notice.
Like my deputy, our deputy head

487
00:19:02,720 --> 00:19:04,240
and head teacher would just walk
in.

488
00:19:04,240 --> 00:19:07,040
They wouldn't message us, but it
was normal and they weren't

489
00:19:07,040 --> 00:19:08,800
judging and they just wanted to
look at the kids.

490
00:19:09,120 --> 00:19:11,200
The amount of times I'd see them
walk in and they were just

491
00:19:11,240 --> 00:19:13,080
honestly late.
They made the point of just

492
00:19:13,080 --> 00:19:15,600
looking at the kids, looking at
the kids checking out.

493
00:19:15,600 --> 00:19:17,080
Oh, your mum said this, by the
way, going through.

494
00:19:17,080 --> 00:19:18,320
Oh, that's not good work.
Well done.

495
00:19:18,360 --> 00:19:19,600
Just watch through.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.

496
00:19:19,600 --> 00:19:21,680
And obviously I'm not stupid.
I know the back of the head.

497
00:19:21,680 --> 00:19:23,560
They're think they're they're
seeing what's happening in the

498
00:19:23,560 --> 00:19:26,040
lesson, but they're not said
they're staring at me with a

499
00:19:26,080 --> 00:19:29,160
clipboard.
So learning what's about notice

500
00:19:29,680 --> 00:19:32,120
depends on the situation and in
this situation, I think it's

501
00:19:32,120 --> 00:19:32,680
just nonsense.
Do.

502
00:19:32,960 --> 00:19:36,320
You know what, that's the whole
time all I was thinking was but

503
00:19:36,360 --> 00:19:38,840
I hate the term learning more.
Does it just sound?

504
00:19:38,840 --> 00:19:42,000
It just sounds so like, what's
the right word?

505
00:19:42,000 --> 00:19:43,520
And the patronises are
obnoxious.

506
00:19:43,520 --> 00:19:45,560
Obnoxious.
Maybe I'm just a learning walk.

507
00:19:45,680 --> 00:19:48,560
Yeah, shut up.
You're the head teacher and your

508
00:19:48,560 --> 00:19:50,880
job is to go around and check
the school's running.

509
00:19:51,560 --> 00:19:52,560
It's just about it.
It's a.

510
00:19:52,560 --> 00:19:54,320
Learning walk, not just what you
do.

511
00:19:55,200 --> 00:19:57,080
Hey kid, we're going on a
learning journey.

512
00:19:57,360 --> 00:19:58,360
Like what?
A lesson.

513
00:19:58,840 --> 00:20:00,520
Now what you're doing is you're
walking around the school

514
00:20:00,520 --> 00:20:02,240
checking that we're all doing
our jobs properly and the kids

515
00:20:02,240 --> 00:20:04,280
are behaving.
Just say it for what it is.

516
00:20:04,280 --> 00:20:05,640
But that's a lot more words than
learning.

517
00:20:05,720 --> 00:20:07,280
Oh.
Yeah, I'm coming around today,

518
00:20:07,880 --> 00:20:09,680
but don't even say anything.
Words don't say anything.

519
00:20:09,680 --> 00:20:10,840
Words don't say anything.
They don't.

520
00:20:11,000 --> 00:20:13,600
I'm doing my job in September.
I say everyone.

521
00:20:13,600 --> 00:20:15,360
I'm the head teacher and I'm
going to do my job.

522
00:20:15,360 --> 00:20:16,960
Yeah, yeah, that's, that's what
happened here, yeah.

523
00:20:16,960 --> 00:20:17,960
Gorgeous.
Don't even say learning more,

524
00:20:18,120 --> 00:20:19,200
just.
I'll go to Lolly Box.

525
00:20:19,200 --> 00:20:21,600
Much shorter, I guess.
Yeah, I hate it.

526
00:20:21,600 --> 00:20:24,760
Yeah, I guess you're you are
definitely someone who when you

527
00:20:24,760 --> 00:20:26,840
think of learning more, yeah,
you're absolutely thinking of

528
00:20:26,840 --> 00:20:28,840
the worst version of that.
Right, not even necessarily.

529
00:20:28,840 --> 00:20:30,880
I just don't like this.
I just honestly, I don't know

530
00:20:30,880 --> 00:20:32,600
what it is.
I I know this is the pettiest

531
00:20:32,600 --> 00:20:34,360
thing I've ever said, but
there's just something about the

532
00:20:34,360 --> 00:20:37,080
phrase when I hear someone
saying deadly serious or we're

533
00:20:37,240 --> 00:20:39,640
doing, you're learning more
country, I'm going to shut up.

534
00:20:39,800 --> 00:20:41,000
What would you say more?
Country.

535
00:20:41,000 --> 00:20:43,600
I don't even know at this point.
I just, I just hate the phrase

536
00:20:43,720 --> 00:20:45,400
we've LED.
Back I definitely said we're

537
00:20:45,400 --> 00:20:46,720
doing a learning.
I'm coming around to observe.

538
00:20:46,720 --> 00:20:48,640
I know I've said it.
Because it's people know what it

539
00:20:48,640 --> 00:20:50,480
is straight away.
Yeah, I know, I know.

540
00:20:50,480 --> 00:20:52,080
It's really.
You know, I can imagine someone

541
00:20:52,080 --> 00:20:53,880
joining, you know, like some
like Hotshots come in.

542
00:20:53,880 --> 00:20:55,840
Our new CEO is coming.
We don't do learning what's

543
00:20:55,840 --> 00:20:57,080
anymore.
We do learning sprints.

544
00:20:57,680 --> 00:20:59,080
Obviously it's the.
Same vibe to me.

545
00:20:59,080 --> 00:21:03,960
I get the same thing, yeah.
So learning what?

546
00:21:03,960 --> 00:21:06,320
So I think, I think learning
what was about notice can be

547
00:21:06,320 --> 00:21:07,440
fine, right.
Yeah.

548
00:21:07,520 --> 00:21:10,120
But what we didn't get when we
did that was a two line e-mail

549
00:21:10,120 --> 00:21:11,640
feedback.
No discussion, no nothing.

550
00:21:11,920 --> 00:21:13,920
I, I found that the most
frustrating.

551
00:21:13,920 --> 00:21:15,480
I don't know if it's a personal
thing of how I am.

552
00:21:15,520 --> 00:21:17,200
You know what I'm like for my
personality in general.

553
00:21:17,320 --> 00:21:18,960
Yeah, if I if.
Thank you.

554
00:21:19,760 --> 00:21:23,680
No context.
Just horrendous, awful.

555
00:21:24,600 --> 00:21:30,680
I I really struggle with
receiving feedback without the

556
00:21:30,680 --> 00:21:32,280
opportunity to just talk about
it.

557
00:21:32,280 --> 00:21:34,640
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Like I, I, I it really, really

558
00:21:34,640 --> 00:21:36,040
went as if it's done as it's
done.

559
00:21:36,040 --> 00:21:38,040
It's, it's like, it's the
feedback, the feedback, it's

560
00:21:38,040 --> 00:21:39,200
done.
It's like, well, I am also a

561
00:21:39,200 --> 00:21:40,160
professional.
No, no, no.

562
00:21:40,160 --> 00:21:41,400
Get over it man.
I've got other stuff to do.

563
00:21:41,400 --> 00:21:42,520
Use your feedback.
Just crack on.

564
00:21:42,520 --> 00:21:44,200
Just action those things.
I'm sorry.

565
00:21:44,200 --> 00:21:46,000
I'm your leader and I have got
other people to lead.

566
00:21:46,000 --> 00:21:46,920
I've.
Got a learning Sprint to get

567
00:21:46,920 --> 00:21:48,040
around.
You just crack on.

568
00:21:48,040 --> 00:21:49,600
I'm jogging at the moment.
I need to be sprinting.

569
00:21:49,600 --> 00:21:51,240
I'm a manager.
I've got, I've got mental age

570
00:21:51,240 --> 00:21:52,040
that's.
Enough, you've talked to me

571
00:21:52,040 --> 00:21:53,080
enough.
I've got to go and speak to this

572
00:21:53,080 --> 00:21:54,920
teaching magic feedback.
Just learn from it and do better

573
00:21:54,920 --> 00:21:56,160
next.
It winds me up because the point

574
00:21:56,160 --> 00:21:59,360
is I've had feedback before and
you know what?

575
00:21:59,360 --> 00:22:01,640
It's not nice.
You know it's not nice receiving

576
00:22:01,640 --> 00:22:04,040
feedback that's negative, right?
It's not nice, but now I can get

577
00:22:04,040 --> 00:22:04,880
over it.
It's fine.

578
00:22:04,880 --> 00:22:06,720
It makes sense.
Yes, I agree, actually.

579
00:22:06,720 --> 00:22:08,000
That's cool.
Oh, I didn't notice that.

580
00:22:08,000 --> 00:22:09,080
And that actually does make
sense.

581
00:22:09,080 --> 00:22:11,960
Thank you for explaining that.
Sometimes you get feedback and

582
00:22:11,960 --> 00:22:15,480
you think there are five reasons
why this didn't happen the way

583
00:22:15,480 --> 00:22:17,040
you think it should have
happened that are all

584
00:22:17,040 --> 00:22:19,200
legitimate.
And I would have just liked an

585
00:22:19,200 --> 00:22:20,760
opportunity to tell you those
things.

586
00:22:21,240 --> 00:22:23,960
Why didn't you just do that?
Oh, maybe it's because I didn't

587
00:22:23,960 --> 00:22:25,480
have that in my classroom at the
point.

588
00:22:25,640 --> 00:22:27,160
You could have just used the
overhead projector.

589
00:22:27,160 --> 00:22:29,160
At this point, it's broken.
Do you know what I mean?

590
00:22:29,160 --> 00:22:31,440
Like there's that level of stuff
where it's like you're not even

591
00:22:31,440 --> 00:22:33,360
getting the basic understanding
of how my classroom works.

592
00:22:33,840 --> 00:22:35,920
And then there's the grey area
nuance bit where it's like.

593
00:22:36,200 --> 00:22:39,200
It's just a preference you.
Just have a preference right now

594
00:22:39,400 --> 00:22:41,480
that you're saying I've done
badly because it wasn't your

595
00:22:41,480 --> 00:22:43,920
preference, right.
It's almost as if like on

596
00:22:43,920 --> 00:22:45,680
Wednesday we're going to talk
about different preferences and

597
00:22:45,680 --> 00:22:48,280
setting for maps and stuff and
how it's just one research paper

598
00:22:48,280 --> 00:22:50,080
away from actually you've just
been completely wrong this whole

599
00:22:50,080 --> 00:22:50,840
time.
Yeah, yeah, definitely.

600
00:22:51,560 --> 00:22:53,040
That's an exaggeration.
Listen on Wednesday.

601
00:22:53,640 --> 00:22:57,320
But yeah, I think the no the no
feedback or chance to respond

602
00:22:57,840 --> 00:22:58,920
once melt.
Yeah, me too.

603
00:22:59,120 --> 00:23:00,760
Yeah, and you're right.
The one, the one that is most

604
00:23:00,760 --> 00:23:05,120
annoying is when is when you
feel like the feedback has been

605
00:23:05,120 --> 00:23:07,520
given and they've fundamentally
missed something really

606
00:23:07,520 --> 00:23:09,400
important about your practise
that absolutely, completely

607
00:23:09,400 --> 00:23:11,200
would change their feedback.
And you're like the fact that

608
00:23:11,200 --> 00:23:14,080
you think I've done this for
like a bad reason, you haven't

609
00:23:14,080 --> 00:23:15,160
even considered that I've
actually done.

610
00:23:15,160 --> 00:23:16,320
I'm working on a higher level
than you mate.

611
00:23:17,000 --> 00:23:18,880
I'm playing 4D chess.
Literally.

612
00:23:18,880 --> 00:23:21,960
But there have been situations
where I've thought to myself, I

613
00:23:21,960 --> 00:23:25,920
can understand why someone
might, my son might come to this

614
00:23:25,920 --> 00:23:28,080
certain conclusion, but they
just haven't considered that.

615
00:23:28,080 --> 00:23:29,760
I had already thought of that
conclusion and realised

616
00:23:29,760 --> 00:23:31,720
something else that that Trump's
it even more and you just

617
00:23:31,720 --> 00:23:33,360
haven't considered that.
So I need that conversation.

618
00:23:33,360 --> 00:23:35,000
Yeah, 100%.
You like to when you're like

619
00:23:35,000 --> 00:23:37,240
when they come in and they, they
might look on the surface of

620
00:23:37,240 --> 00:23:39,440
like how to save time in
transitions or something, right.

621
00:23:39,480 --> 00:23:40,640
Yeah.
And then I'd be like, actually,

622
00:23:40,640 --> 00:23:43,480
do you know what you could have
saved time here if you hadn't,

623
00:23:43,640 --> 00:23:46,640
if you haven't got them to do
this task at the start and it

624
00:23:46,640 --> 00:23:48,560
could have saved time, you could
have got to the the chunk of it

625
00:23:48,560 --> 00:23:51,000
a bit more quickly.
And like that on the surface can

626
00:23:51,000 --> 00:23:52,480
be a really reasonable bit of
feedback.

627
00:23:52,720 --> 00:23:55,160
But then like you said, you're,
you're in your, you're there and

628
00:23:55,160 --> 00:23:57,440
you think, oh, but I just teach
them for four lessons in a row

629
00:23:57,440 --> 00:23:59,480
before this.
And actually, I found when I do

630
00:23:59,480 --> 00:24:01,600
this little task at the start,
which just gets them to talk on

631
00:24:01,600 --> 00:24:04,680
their table or something, it
really helps them in the end.

632
00:24:04,760 --> 00:24:07,280
And it's a, it's a worthwhile 5
minutes because the quality of

633
00:24:07,280 --> 00:24:08,400
the work they did at the end
increases.

634
00:24:08,640 --> 00:24:11,000
And it's like, you've not even
taken into account that I could

635
00:24:11,000 --> 00:24:13,200
have thought that all you're
thinking is that I'm an idiot

636
00:24:13,200 --> 00:24:14,960
because I thought, let's waste 5
minutes doing this.

637
00:24:15,120 --> 00:24:17,920
It's like I'm not though.
And there might have been a

638
00:24:17,920 --> 00:24:21,080
different situation where
actually that feedback could

639
00:24:21,080 --> 00:24:23,640
have gone unchallenged, and they
might think that's good feedback

640
00:24:23,800 --> 00:24:25,680
because it could have been
actually in that situation.

641
00:24:25,680 --> 00:24:27,440
Yeah, they were right.
We didn't need to do that task.

642
00:24:27,480 --> 00:24:28,600
Yeah.
But there are also some other

643
00:24:28,600 --> 00:24:30,480
ones where you just don't think
far enough.

644
00:24:30,480 --> 00:24:35,440
So I think poor, poor feedback
in school is is a poison.

645
00:24:35,600 --> 00:24:39,120
I really think it's a poison big
time, because receiving negative

646
00:24:39,120 --> 00:24:41,800
or constructive feedback is
inherently not a nice thing to

647
00:24:41,800 --> 00:24:45,680
hear, and if you're doing it
badly consistently it's just

648
00:24:45,680 --> 00:24:47,880
going to brew up resentment.
That's exactly what I was going

649
00:24:47,880 --> 00:24:50,280
to say is resentment is is
absolutely the word.

650
00:24:50,600 --> 00:24:53,000
And I know it because I felt it
and I've been there and it made

651
00:24:53,000 --> 00:24:55,280
me want to leave schools.
It does it impacts you

652
00:24:55,280 --> 00:24:56,760
massively.
So just finishing off this

653
00:24:56,760 --> 00:24:58,840
question then, because we kind
of went off on tangent again.

654
00:24:58,840 --> 00:25:00,920
What would you say?
We never do that.

655
00:25:01,080 --> 00:25:02,240
What would you say?
There's a part.

656
00:25:02,240 --> 00:25:06,400
In the middle.
Again, not again to this person

657
00:25:06,400 --> 00:25:08,600
who said like, what do they do?
Basically they've had they've

658
00:25:08,600 --> 00:25:11,480
had a learning 2 learning walks.
Yeah, stupid name.

659
00:25:11,560 --> 00:25:13,760
Yeah.
And the first one was it's too

660
00:25:13,760 --> 00:25:14,840
busy.
The next one was I would lacks

661
00:25:14,840 --> 00:25:16,360
evidence of learning.
So basically contradict

662
00:25:16,360 --> 00:25:18,080
themselves.
What do you actually do in that?

663
00:25:18,080 --> 00:25:20,680
Situation So what I would do in
that situation is and knowing

664
00:25:20,680 --> 00:25:21,920
I've got to stay in this school,
right.

665
00:25:22,040 --> 00:25:23,240
That's because it's just
ridiculous.

666
00:25:23,320 --> 00:25:26,080
It's quite yeah.
Anyway, who goes?

667
00:25:26,440 --> 00:25:29,320
I would.
I would say that that to me

668
00:25:29,400 --> 00:25:30,840
personally, would be enough
proof.

669
00:25:30,840 --> 00:25:34,080
This whole process is bollocks.
But this to me is proof.

670
00:25:34,080 --> 00:25:35,560
You're saying it's too much.
It's too little.

671
00:25:35,560 --> 00:25:37,760
I've changed what you said last
time I took it on board.

672
00:25:37,920 --> 00:25:39,960
Maybe I thought it was busy
because actually it helps my

673
00:25:39,960 --> 00:25:40,920
class.
But you know what you said?

674
00:25:40,920 --> 00:25:42,120
It's too busy.
I'll just change it.

675
00:25:42,120 --> 00:25:43,560
That's fine.
Next time you come in.

676
00:25:43,560 --> 00:25:45,320
Oh, yeah.
It's lacking, isn't it?

677
00:25:45,320 --> 00:25:47,000
Not much on there.
It's like, Oh my God, I don't

678
00:25:47,000 --> 00:25:48,360
even think this is the way to do
things.

679
00:25:48,560 --> 00:25:50,480
I'm only doing it this way
because last time you told me to

680
00:25:50,480 --> 00:25:52,400
change it.
I already think this is stupid,

681
00:25:52,400 --> 00:25:53,400
and now you're telling me it's
stupid.

682
00:25:53,640 --> 00:25:56,280
Yeah, that's enough information
for me to know that I should not

683
00:25:56,280 --> 00:25:57,960
be taking this feedback
seriously at all.

684
00:25:58,360 --> 00:26:00,240
So all you do is you wait for
the next one.

685
00:26:00,400 --> 00:26:01,360
Wait for the feedback.
Yeah.

686
00:26:01,360 --> 00:26:02,360
No problem.
Yeah.

687
00:26:02,360 --> 00:26:04,520
And do what you want to do and
do nothing and do what you want

688
00:26:04,520 --> 00:26:06,360
to do anyway.
Genuinely, just do what you want

689
00:26:06,360 --> 00:26:07,240
to do anyway.
Because.

690
00:26:07,280 --> 00:26:09,440
Because no, Even if you changed
it, they'd give you some crappy

691
00:26:09,440 --> 00:26:11,000
feedback next time.
If you don't, they'll give you

692
00:26:11,000 --> 00:26:12,680
some crappy feedback.
You're going to get crappy,

693
00:26:12,680 --> 00:26:13,840
awful feedback.
Yeah.

694
00:26:14,000 --> 00:26:15,680
Cool.
You've made this whole thing

695
00:26:15,680 --> 00:26:16,640
pointless.
It could have been really

696
00:26:16,640 --> 00:26:18,040
constructive and helpful, but
it's not.

697
00:26:18,400 --> 00:26:20,480
I'm not going to waste my time
over this anymore.

698
00:26:20,560 --> 00:26:22,600
I'm going to do what I want to
do until you prove to me that

699
00:26:22,600 --> 00:26:24,200
your feedback's good.
Just because you're in a

700
00:26:24,200 --> 00:26:26,840
position of power in this school
does not automatically mean that

701
00:26:26,840 --> 00:26:31,480
you're always right off.
Some some people would argue

702
00:26:31,480 --> 00:26:33,600
that even though that's that,
that basically that's the easy

703
00:26:33,600 --> 00:26:36,240
way out, like disengaging with
it and ignoring it is kind of

704
00:26:36,240 --> 00:26:38,000
the easy way out and they're.
Only once it's been proven to be

705
00:26:38,000 --> 00:26:39,200
bollocks.
That's my point.

706
00:26:39,280 --> 00:26:41,760
Only once you've seen it does
it's it's not even rooted in

707
00:26:41,760 --> 00:26:42,920
anything useful.
That's what my.

708
00:26:42,960 --> 00:26:45,560
Point is there a space here for
actually pushing back and

709
00:26:45,560 --> 00:26:48,680
fighting back and trying to make
the point that you the thing

710
00:26:48,680 --> 00:26:51,360
that you're ignoring and just
rolling about whatever is there

711
00:26:51,360 --> 00:26:53,880
a space for saying actually no
stand up for yourself and say to

712
00:26:53,880 --> 00:26:56,000
them and call them out on this
stuff repeatedly until they

713
00:26:56,000 --> 00:26:58,840
start to listen and a. 100% but
like it just gets to the point

714
00:26:58,840 --> 00:27:01,840
where I can imagine it being
like they clearly don't care.

715
00:27:02,080 --> 00:27:04,760
They've clearly been told, like
I've had leaders before tell me

716
00:27:05,000 --> 00:27:07,760
like middle leaders who like in
between who've said to me, like

717
00:27:07,760 --> 00:27:11,000
if it's felt like they're on
side, I just, I do just need to

718
00:27:11,000 --> 00:27:12,680
put something down now.
I need to put something down

719
00:27:12,680 --> 00:27:14,600
that was bad.
Basically, I need to put

720
00:27:14,600 --> 00:27:16,880
something down that wasn't good.
I have to give you something.

721
00:27:17,080 --> 00:27:19,840
It's the rules that I have to be
seen as a manager to be managing

722
00:27:19,840 --> 00:27:21,760
you to get better.
And if I don't have anything in

723
00:27:21,760 --> 00:27:23,640
here that makes you better, then
it's going to look bad for me.

724
00:27:24,360 --> 00:27:27,360
And you just both sat in a room
knowing it's complete and utter

725
00:27:27,360 --> 00:27:28,880
nonsense what you're going
through.

726
00:27:29,160 --> 00:27:31,240
But someone above who's not even
stepped foot in the classroom

727
00:27:31,240 --> 00:27:34,400
has said you need to have that
it that that's the point where

728
00:27:34,400 --> 00:27:36,640
I'm like, OK, whatever.
Yeah, that's the point where I'm

729
00:27:36,640 --> 00:27:39,720
just like, OK, I, I am just
going to not care.

730
00:27:39,920 --> 00:27:42,200
I will never ever.
I've told the Story 3 times on

731
00:27:42,200 --> 00:27:43,840
the on this podcast, but it's
been a long time I.

732
00:27:43,840 --> 00:27:46,520
Want to two?
100 I will never forget the

733
00:27:46,520 --> 00:27:49,120
moment in which our most recent
head with the school we worked

734
00:27:49,120 --> 00:27:53,440
at the longest did an
observation of some sort, and

735
00:27:53,440 --> 00:27:56,400
the feedback had no constructive
There was nothing.

736
00:27:56,400 --> 00:27:57,880
He was like, oh, it was just a
really good lesson.

737
00:27:57,920 --> 00:27:59,320
It was just an afternoon lesson.
It wasn't.

738
00:27:59,680 --> 00:28:02,000
You thought I made it sound bad.
No, no, no, no.

739
00:28:02,000 --> 00:28:04,280
Had no constructive feedback.
No good thing.

740
00:28:04,480 --> 00:28:05,360
Yeah, yeah.
No, of course.

741
00:28:05,640 --> 00:28:07,080
Had no negative.
Had no negative.

742
00:28:07,080 --> 00:28:09,360
He wasn't.
Basically, he saw a lesson and

743
00:28:09,360 --> 00:28:11,000
he thought the lesson was really
good and he really enjoyed the

744
00:28:11,000 --> 00:28:12,680
lesson because I'm such a good
teacher.

745
00:28:12,680 --> 00:28:14,720
That's what I'm trying to.
Say and but the point was he

746
00:28:14,720 --> 00:28:16,880
wasn't like doing that thing you
just said there of like, oh,

747
00:28:16,880 --> 00:28:19,320
I've got I've got to say
something was bad.

748
00:28:19,320 --> 00:28:20,640
He just went, yeah, it was a
really good lesson.

749
00:28:20,640 --> 00:28:21,640
Yeah, Thank you.
Carried on.

750
00:28:21,880 --> 00:28:24,080
And I and I couldn't believe it
because I was like, hey, this

751
00:28:24,080 --> 00:28:25,960
can't be possible because I'm so
used to schools just picking

752
00:28:25,960 --> 00:28:27,600
about everything and even stuff.
I don't disagree if they're

753
00:28:27,600 --> 00:28:30,960
still picking it apart.
And I was like, oh, that's cool.

754
00:28:30,960 --> 00:28:32,840
And then whenever I did get
constructive feedback from that

755
00:28:32,840 --> 00:28:34,720
person, I really took it on
board and listened to it because

756
00:28:34,720 --> 00:28:36,160
I was like, I respect this
person because when?

757
00:28:36,200 --> 00:28:37,480
Because when they didn't have to
say it.

758
00:28:37,480 --> 00:28:40,160
You sure you talked about the
primary Norden last time?

759
00:28:40,160 --> 00:28:41,360
He said it was perfect.
What's changed?

760
00:28:41,960 --> 00:28:42,720
Yeah, true.
True.

761
00:28:43,080 --> 00:28:45,680
But I didn't.
I respected his opinion because

762
00:28:45,880 --> 00:28:48,200
it was real.
Yeah, He didn't just force it

763
00:28:48,200 --> 00:28:50,600
because all the structure of
this format form, the formality

764
00:28:50,600 --> 00:28:52,640
of this tells me and I have to
give you 2 points that are good

765
00:28:52,800 --> 00:28:56,120
and actually at one point, OK,
you just, you just told me

766
00:28:56,120 --> 00:28:58,280
you're honest reflection of the
lesson and I happen to be a,

767
00:28:58,840 --> 00:29:01,440
well good teacher.
It's true.

768
00:29:01,920 --> 00:29:03,920
It's true.
It's fine.

769
00:29:04,000 --> 00:29:06,080
Yeah, I completely agree.
I completely agree.

770
00:29:06,240 --> 00:29:08,640
It's this obsession, isn't it?
It's just a it's a toxic

771
00:29:08,640 --> 00:29:10,560
obsession.
We've always, always, always

772
00:29:10,560 --> 00:29:13,280
happened to get better.
It can be fine.

773
00:29:13,280 --> 00:29:14,920
Do you know what he could have
done?

774
00:29:15,200 --> 00:29:17,320
He honestly, and I've seen you
teach, so I know he could have

775
00:29:17,320 --> 00:29:20,520
found something wrong with
that's my bubble.

776
00:29:20,760 --> 00:29:22,640
He he could, he could have found
something.

777
00:29:22,640 --> 00:29:24,520
Of course, there might be people
listening going, Oh, actually,

778
00:29:24,520 --> 00:29:26,800
that's bad leadership.
That's bad leadership, because

779
00:29:26,800 --> 00:29:28,320
obviously there's always
something you could just say and

780
00:29:28,320 --> 00:29:29,640
you could do it in a nice way,
right?

781
00:29:29,640 --> 00:29:31,920
You could do it in a nice way.
And it's just always a bit icky

782
00:29:31,920 --> 00:29:33,520
to me that they would he would
suggest that it's fine.

783
00:29:33,640 --> 00:29:36,200
He wasn't even suggesting that.
No, he wasn't even suggesting

784
00:29:36,200 --> 00:29:37,480
that.
He was genuinely just saying

785
00:29:37,480 --> 00:29:39,800
like as a that is a completely
acceptable lesson.

786
00:29:39,800 --> 00:29:41,120
If anything, it was a good
lesson.

787
00:29:41,800 --> 00:29:43,520
I'm happy the children, you
could say.

788
00:29:44,760 --> 00:29:47,080
I'm happy the children in my
school are receiving this from

789
00:29:47,080 --> 00:29:48,800
you and just making you feel
good.

790
00:29:49,240 --> 00:29:50,240
That's the end of it.
Oh, cool.

791
00:29:50,440 --> 00:29:52,600
Yeah, it's fine.
It doesn't mean that you've

792
00:29:52,600 --> 00:29:54,960
reached a, that you've
completely teached perfection.

793
00:29:54,960 --> 00:29:57,120
Yeah, it doesn't mean that.
It just means that you wanted to

794
00:29:57,120 --> 00:29:58,360
give you some praise.
Yeah.

795
00:29:58,360 --> 00:30:02,160
Which in it's in of itself is a
good motivator to make you teach

796
00:30:02,160 --> 00:30:03,280
better next time.
Yeah.

797
00:30:03,360 --> 00:30:06,360
How much better was your next
lesson after that than it would

798
00:30:06,360 --> 00:30:08,400
have been if he'd come in and
been like, oh, this, this, this,

799
00:30:08,400 --> 00:30:10,680
this actually?
He put the bar so high.

800
00:30:10,680 --> 00:30:12,040
Next time I was, I came with my
feet up.

801
00:30:12,040 --> 00:30:13,280
I was like I don't need to work
this hard.

802
00:30:15,280 --> 00:30:17,200
You're really still managing to
paint this as a bad thing I'm

803
00:30:17,200 --> 00:30:19,200
just doing.
Anything I can to troll in this

804
00:30:19,200 --> 00:30:20,600
moment?
The, the overarching point,

805
00:30:20,600 --> 00:30:22,800
exactly what you said was in
that moment that head teacher

806
00:30:22,800 --> 00:30:24,720
decided to just be nice and make
me feel good.

807
00:30:24,800 --> 00:30:26,840
And it worked really well, yeah.
That's it.

808
00:30:27,080 --> 00:30:29,280
And and legend has it that two
of your hairs grow back.

809
00:30:29,640 --> 00:30:30,960
Yeah, that's true.
It's just true.

810
00:30:31,040 --> 00:30:32,600
I'm on 5.
Heads, now explain why you've

811
00:30:32,600 --> 00:30:35,960
got so little working with me.
Yeah, OK, cool.

812
00:30:35,960 --> 00:30:38,720
Next, next question.
Am I in the minority thinking

813
00:30:38,720 --> 00:30:40,680
that Sats in year 6 are a good
thing?

814
00:30:41,360 --> 00:30:43,280
Every other year group does end
of year tests.

815
00:30:43,400 --> 00:30:46,040
It narrows the focus for staff
in English and in math lessons,

816
00:30:46,400 --> 00:30:48,760
and it sets kids up for when
they do more formal testing

817
00:30:48,760 --> 00:30:52,360
later in their school life.
Obviously it can be done badly,

818
00:30:52,440 --> 00:30:55,720
but when people say we should
outright scrap stats, I do feel

819
00:30:55,720 --> 00:30:57,280
like it's a little bit of an
overreach.

820
00:30:57,280 --> 00:30:59,080
It's a really good question,
really good question because

821
00:30:59,080 --> 00:31:02,760
I've, I've always struggled to
articulate where I stand on this

822
00:31:02,760 --> 00:31:05,000
whole argument because my gut,
if I'm just going to be honest,

823
00:31:05,000 --> 00:31:10,280
right, I'm not try not to be
persuaded by the way people

824
00:31:10,280 --> 00:31:12,640
think online and and the the
status quo, right?

825
00:31:12,640 --> 00:31:15,120
My genuine gut feeling is Satsa
pretty good.

826
00:31:15,240 --> 00:31:16,400
They're all right, They're all
right.

827
00:31:16,400 --> 00:31:19,600
Like I've never actually thought
to myself, these are so damning

828
00:31:19,600 --> 00:31:22,000
that we should immediately scrap
them and not replace them with

829
00:31:22,000 --> 00:31:23,120
anything.
Like I actually have never

830
00:31:23,120 --> 00:31:26,040
thought that I've considered it
based when we had like COVID

831
00:31:26,040 --> 00:31:28,680
time, I definitely thought to
myself, interesting.

832
00:31:28,680 --> 00:31:30,960
Had a couple of the analystics
teacher for that whole period of

833
00:31:30,960 --> 00:31:33,040
time, didn't have SATS for a
couple of years.

834
00:31:33,360 --> 00:31:34,800
Didn't seem to make much
difference.

835
00:31:34,880 --> 00:31:37,560
Whilst also ignoring the fact
that we did mock Sats anyway

836
00:31:37,560 --> 00:31:38,840
with those kids to get data
points.

837
00:31:38,840 --> 00:31:40,520
So they kind of did have sats,
you know what I mean?

838
00:31:40,520 --> 00:31:43,720
It was like I just in my head, I
was no official sats.

839
00:31:43,720 --> 00:31:44,760
Wow.
Didn't make much difference,

840
00:31:44,800 --> 00:31:46,520
still did it anyway.
Chose to do it you.

841
00:31:46,520 --> 00:31:49,080
Know, I know we're going to go
into a few things here, but I

842
00:31:49,080 --> 00:31:51,800
want to pick you on that a bit
more because I think what you've

843
00:31:51,800 --> 00:31:55,240
described there is what a lot of
people still think SAT should be

844
00:31:55,240 --> 00:31:56,680
like in terms of it's scrapped,
right?

845
00:31:57,040 --> 00:32:00,480
So I don't think, I don't think
many people, correct me if I'm

846
00:32:00,480 --> 00:32:01,800
wrong, there might be some
people out there, but I don't

847
00:32:01,800 --> 00:32:04,440
think many people are saying we
shouldn't do any kind of formal

848
00:32:04,440 --> 00:32:06,760
assessment whatsoever.
Because like this question says

849
00:32:06,760 --> 00:32:09,720
here, like the end of year 3, we
do a, we do an assessment, see

850
00:32:09,720 --> 00:32:11,480
where they're at end of year 4,
end of Year 5.

851
00:32:11,720 --> 00:32:13,760
So I think you saying we did it
anyway.

852
00:32:13,760 --> 00:32:15,240
I'm like, well, that's not
really the point.

853
00:32:15,240 --> 00:32:17,800
Like, I don't, I don't think if
people got their way who wanted

854
00:32:17,800 --> 00:32:21,600
to scrap Sats that finally got
that, I don't think suddenly we

855
00:32:21,600 --> 00:32:22,960
wouldn't be assessing children
at the end.

856
00:32:23,120 --> 00:32:25,400
I think what maybe people are
talking more about is the

857
00:32:25,400 --> 00:32:28,320
pressure of league tables, the
pressure from the top down, the

858
00:32:28,400 --> 00:32:30,800
the, the obsession with getting
to a certain point because it's

859
00:32:30,800 --> 00:32:32,880
going to look bad for the school
and then leadership getting

860
00:32:32,880 --> 00:32:34,680
stressed and then governor's
getting stressed.

861
00:32:35,240 --> 00:32:38,240
All of that can be removed from
scrapping sacks in terms of

862
00:32:38,240 --> 00:32:41,000
scrapping the system.
But I think you can still

863
00:32:41,000 --> 00:32:42,880
maintain an end of year
assessment to see where the

864
00:32:42,880 --> 00:32:45,000
children are at.
So did did you notice a

865
00:32:45,000 --> 00:32:50,360
difference between when you had
a a formal SATS before COVID and

866
00:32:50,360 --> 00:32:52,880
after COVID compared to when?
Yeah, well we just did SATS in

867
00:32:52,880 --> 00:32:56,000
the VA 6 anyway in 2020 and 2021
just to see where they're at.

868
00:32:56,000 --> 00:32:58,320
Did you notice a difference?
Well, it's a difference in the

869
00:32:58,320 --> 00:33:00,520
in the children or the way we
everything, the whole.

870
00:33:00,520 --> 00:33:02,360
Thing everything like did you
think to yourself, but you know

871
00:33:02,360 --> 00:33:04,680
what, this is actually better
because I still get the benefits

872
00:33:04,680 --> 00:33:06,920
of assessment.
I still get the benefits of

873
00:33:06,920 --> 00:33:08,760
seeing where they're at in the
benchmark or compared to their

874
00:33:08,760 --> 00:33:10,720
peers, etcetera.
But we're not going to get

875
00:33:10,720 --> 00:33:12,480
published league tables.
We're not going to get the

876
00:33:12,480 --> 00:33:15,000
pressure of actually our school
is here, it's there.

877
00:33:15,000 --> 00:33:17,440
The the progress points haven't
been acceptable blah blah blah.

878
00:33:18,480 --> 00:33:21,080
What did you feel that or?
Kind of, yeah, like the pros and

879
00:33:21,080 --> 00:33:22,880
cons, right?
The, the pro was, it was like

880
00:33:22,880 --> 00:33:25,760
SAT's light.
It did take away the things that

881
00:33:25,760 --> 00:33:27,480
I think are very valid arguments
by the way, of, you know,

882
00:33:27,480 --> 00:33:29,360
getting rid of the the league
tables, put on all this

883
00:33:29,360 --> 00:33:30,480
unnecessary pressure, blah,
blah, blah.

884
00:33:31,080 --> 00:33:35,520
But on the on the on the, the
cons side, it like it would have

885
00:33:35,520 --> 00:33:38,040
been maybe nice to have some
national data just as a

886
00:33:38,040 --> 00:33:40,480
benchmark just to see kind of
where we were or local data.

887
00:33:40,480 --> 00:33:43,600
I don't know.
And I, and I think I don't know

888
00:33:43,600 --> 00:33:46,920
where I lie on this, but there's
the severity of the way the Sats

889
00:33:46,920 --> 00:33:53,120
are taken and administered it.
Without that, it would have been

890
00:33:53,120 --> 00:33:55,440
easy to cheat on those tests.
It would have been easy for

891
00:33:55,440 --> 00:33:57,880
teachers to just, it's always
all just chill kids.

892
00:33:57,880 --> 00:33:59,280
I'm just going to read out the
paper to you today.

893
00:33:59,280 --> 00:34:00,920
It's not the real.
Sad, but they don't go any much.

894
00:34:01,160 --> 00:34:03,000
Doesn't go anywhere but like,
what's the point then?

895
00:34:03,000 --> 00:34:04,080
Like, I don't know.
That's my point.

896
00:34:04,080 --> 00:34:05,800
That is that is lit.
So this is what I'm saying.

897
00:34:05,800 --> 00:34:07,520
Yeah, because it doesn't go
anywhere because there aren't

898
00:34:07,520 --> 00:34:09,120
league tables.
What is the point in cheating?

899
00:34:09,120 --> 00:34:11,800
Like it's it's almost as if
saying the end of year 4 test is

900
00:34:11,800 --> 00:34:14,159
pointless because it's not got
severe invigilators and rules.

901
00:34:14,280 --> 00:34:16,679
It's not pointless.
We, we, we, if anything, we

902
00:34:16,679 --> 00:34:20,280
administer it more strictly in a
way in terms of it's just useful

903
00:34:20,280 --> 00:34:21,480
information for my colleague
next year.

904
00:34:21,800 --> 00:34:23,719
I don't think that's true.
I think based on my experience

905
00:34:23,719 --> 00:34:26,080
of every other year group where
it's not SATS, I think cheating

906
00:34:26,080 --> 00:34:28,920
is way more rife potentially.
I, I from my experience, I think

907
00:34:28,920 --> 00:34:30,880
SATS cheating is rife.
I, I do also think that

908
00:34:30,880 --> 00:34:32,199
genuinely, but I think it'd be
worse.

909
00:34:32,199 --> 00:34:34,719
My point is I think people are
way more relaxed on the end of

910
00:34:34,719 --> 00:34:36,040
year three tests and the year 4
tests.

911
00:34:36,040 --> 00:34:37,239
That's true.
I do think that.

912
00:34:37,239 --> 00:34:39,679
And and then I count this
countless times I've seen like

913
00:34:39,679 --> 00:34:42,280
just crappy data going up to the
next year group or from key

914
00:34:42,280 --> 00:34:44,159
stage 1 to key stage 2.
There's different schools or

915
00:34:44,159 --> 00:34:47,080
whatever and where I'm like.
Do you think sats?

916
00:34:47,080 --> 00:34:50,199
Do you think like having really
strict, you know, rules around

917
00:34:50,199 --> 00:34:51,840
it, it's national debt, do you
think that improved that?

918
00:34:51,920 --> 00:34:54,320
I think so, yeah, a little bit.
I think it puts the fear into

919
00:34:54,320 --> 00:34:56,400
people of like maybe I shouldn't
this time.

920
00:34:56,560 --> 00:34:58,840
I really do think it's I don't
think it's perfect.

921
00:34:58,840 --> 00:35:00,480
I think that plenty of people
still cheat on the Sats.

922
00:35:00,480 --> 00:35:02,880
We'll find other ways around it.
Let's say they're they're

923
00:35:02,880 --> 00:35:05,680
choosing 5% and they maybe would
have done it 10% if they didn't

924
00:35:05,680 --> 00:35:07,280
have anyone, you know, standing
on the shoulder knowing there's

925
00:35:07,280 --> 00:35:09,240
official administration, we
could be observed at any point

926
00:35:09,240 --> 00:35:10,640
and completely barred from the
Sats.

927
00:35:11,240 --> 00:35:13,160
I do think they have that has
some impact.

928
00:35:13,160 --> 00:35:15,560
Whether it makes me think
therefore we should keep the

929
00:35:15,560 --> 00:35:17,560
system exactly as it is is a
stretch, I don't think.

930
00:35:17,560 --> 00:35:18,960
That's OK.
What would be your answer then?

931
00:35:18,960 --> 00:35:22,080
Would you, if you really just,
you know, deeped it for a second

932
00:35:22,080 --> 00:35:26,480
and thought, OK, end of year
six, it sounds as if you do want

933
00:35:26,480 --> 00:35:29,600
the bar to be like a national,
you want that national data, you

934
00:35:29,600 --> 00:35:31,440
want it to be like a, a more
formal task.

935
00:35:31,440 --> 00:35:34,200
Yeah, yeah.
You wouldn't change anything

936
00:35:34,200 --> 00:35:38,360
then.
I would remove I think.

937
00:35:38,360 --> 00:35:42,480
I think I'd remove any link
between SAT's progress data and

938
00:35:42,480 --> 00:35:45,240
GCSE because most schools just
disregard it anyway and just do

939
00:35:45,240 --> 00:35:48,440
RE and just reattest kids at
7:00 and just have just get rid

940
00:35:48,440 --> 00:35:49,520
of the link completely between
like.

941
00:35:49,520 --> 00:35:51,400
Benchmarks and even if they
don't, a voice found that a bit

942
00:35:51,400 --> 00:35:53,920
odd where, you know, I think we
all agree that it would be a bit

943
00:35:53,920 --> 00:35:57,360
daft to take a snapshot from
when the child is 11.

944
00:35:57,520 --> 00:35:59,000
Therefore their predicted grades
are this.

945
00:35:59,000 --> 00:36:01,080
Therefore, I'm not saying
schools don't do this because

946
00:36:01,080 --> 00:36:03,600
schools do, but they look at
their predicted grades and be

947
00:36:03,600 --> 00:36:05,440
like, we need to get to here and
then it will help you with the

948
00:36:05,440 --> 00:36:06,800
support you need, etcetera,
etcetera.

949
00:36:07,440 --> 00:36:09,600
Even even though that is used by
some schools, I mean, you said

950
00:36:09,600 --> 00:36:11,360
lots of schools disregard it,
lots of schools don't because

951
00:36:11,360 --> 00:36:12,560
they are literally judged on it,
right?

952
00:36:12,560 --> 00:36:15,920
It's still important.
I I still think like whether or

953
00:36:15,920 --> 00:36:18,280
not that's used correctly or
not, it's stupid.

954
00:36:18,320 --> 00:36:20,160
Yeah, really I agree it's
stupid.

955
00:36:20,160 --> 00:36:21,680
Kids learn at different rates,
etcetera.

956
00:36:21,680 --> 00:36:24,920
And what, what you got in year 6
in a, in an English and maths

957
00:36:24,920 --> 00:36:27,600
test shouldn't really give it
all your predicted grades to see

958
00:36:27,600 --> 00:36:29,760
what, you know, intervention you
need for every subject.

959
00:36:29,760 --> 00:36:31,520
Like that seems daft to me
anyway.

960
00:36:31,520 --> 00:36:34,680
So I I think a lot of secondary
school teachers feel the same

961
00:36:34,680 --> 00:36:36,840
way, where it would be nice to
not have that burden on the

962
00:36:36,840 --> 00:36:39,200
secondary school as well to get
them to that level.

963
00:36:39,200 --> 00:36:39,840
I agree.
I agree.

964
00:36:39,840 --> 00:36:41,480
So I get rid of that.
I'd also get rid of the league

965
00:36:41,480 --> 00:36:42,680
tables.
I just don't think they're.

966
00:36:42,720 --> 00:36:43,600
I don't.
I just think they're.

967
00:36:43,640 --> 00:36:45,160
Only comparing.
You literally just said it'd be

968
00:36:45,160 --> 00:36:47,520
nice to get national.
Data OK yeah interesting.

969
00:36:47,520 --> 00:36:48,720
You just need two different
lenses.

970
00:36:49,000 --> 00:36:52,520
I think the kind of public
perception of like posting, oh,

971
00:36:52,680 --> 00:36:54,800
this school's got this data.
I think there could be an

972
00:36:54,800 --> 00:36:56,800
internal database that
professionals could use fine,

973
00:36:57,040 --> 00:36:58,880
but I don't think we need to be
just dragging about.

974
00:36:59,320 --> 00:37:01,000
Maybe maybe that maybe that's
the middle ground.

975
00:37:01,000 --> 00:37:04,840
I don't know.
I I think having access to

976
00:37:04,840 --> 00:37:07,400
national averages is useful.
I don't think I need to be able

977
00:37:07,400 --> 00:37:08,920
to go on to actually, I'm going
to take back what I said.

978
00:37:08,920 --> 00:37:10,880
I don't think I need to even go
into an internal system to be

979
00:37:10,880 --> 00:37:12,000
able to look up what every
single.

980
00:37:12,000 --> 00:37:13,080
School.
I think it'll be a weird middle

981
00:37:13,080 --> 00:37:15,480
ground to to have it but then.
Just you don't need it.

982
00:37:15,480 --> 00:37:17,320
The only reason I was thinking
we have it is the averages, but

983
00:37:17,320 --> 00:37:19,880
we don't even need to see this.
Like I just honestly all that's

984
00:37:19,880 --> 00:37:22,480
useful to me each year is
literally like how roughly how

985
00:37:22,480 --> 00:37:23,480
is everyone else doing?
Cool.

986
00:37:24,000 --> 00:37:27,560
Do you think, do you think it
it's that data should exist

987
00:37:27,640 --> 00:37:29,880
though at all?
Do you think, like, you know,

988
00:37:30,800 --> 00:37:33,160
officials should be able to see
it, et cetera, people above the

989
00:37:33,160 --> 00:37:34,560
government, et cetera?
I mean, I guess so, I guess

990
00:37:34,560 --> 00:37:36,760
because the data will exist like
by definition.

991
00:37:36,760 --> 00:37:38,280
I just don't think it needs to
be published.

992
00:37:38,400 --> 00:37:40,280
Yeah, genuinely, it just doesn't
need to be the league tables.

993
00:37:40,280 --> 00:37:41,520
They just.
The league tables seem

994
00:37:41,520 --> 00:37:43,200
insidious.
They, they are insidious, that's

995
00:37:43,200 --> 00:37:44,320
all.
They don't, I don't think

996
00:37:44,760 --> 00:37:47,320
whatever net gain they get, like
whatever gains where they give

997
00:37:47,320 --> 00:37:48,600
there's, there's a lot of.
Loss.

998
00:37:48,600 --> 00:37:50,760
Well, the gain is it's pressure.
Yeah, isn't it?

999
00:37:50,760 --> 00:37:51,960
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Think how many people think, oh

1000
00:37:51,960 --> 00:37:53,120
God, yeah.
Got to get higher up that league

1001
00:37:53,120 --> 00:37:54,080
table.
If anything.

1002
00:37:54,080 --> 00:37:56,480
It promotes more cheating.
Yeah, it promotes more flirting

1003
00:37:56,480 --> 00:37:59,200
around the lines and it promotes
more horrendous timetables

1004
00:37:59,200 --> 00:38:00,880
leading up to SAT's where all
they do is English, maths and

1005
00:38:00,880 --> 00:38:03,160
the kids just can't stand it.
Yeah, there's so many messages

1006
00:38:03,160 --> 00:38:05,080
of people saying that the kid,
they've got messages from year

1007
00:38:05,080 --> 00:38:07,640
six teachers saying the kids
can't stand school now.

1008
00:38:07,680 --> 00:38:10,040
Yeah, what are we doing?
It's rubbish.

1009
00:38:10,360 --> 00:38:11,880
So again, how do we tackle that
as well?

1010
00:38:11,880 --> 00:38:13,360
Because I still think about
despite all this, I think

1011
00:38:13,360 --> 00:38:14,680
there's probably one more point
to this.

1012
00:38:15,320 --> 00:38:19,200
I still think having having it
more formalised in the year 6 is

1013
00:38:19,200 --> 00:38:20,960
just going to make it more
likely that that data is

1014
00:38:20,960 --> 00:38:23,200
trustworthy and it is useful to
have that national benchmark

1015
00:38:23,200 --> 00:38:25,120
when kids transition from
primary school to secondary

1016
00:38:25,120 --> 00:38:26,080
school.
I think there is still use for

1017
00:38:26,080 --> 00:38:27,800
that, right?
I think the SAT's has a use.

1018
00:38:28,000 --> 00:38:30,960
So how else do we make it so
that it, it doesn't become this

1019
00:38:31,040 --> 00:38:33,440
horrible burden on on staff and
children?

1020
00:38:33,600 --> 00:38:36,560
Probably not linking performance
pay to it as well.

1021
00:38:36,640 --> 00:38:39,000
Genuinely, there's little things
like this that probably applies

1022
00:38:39,000 --> 00:38:41,440
really just to all like that
happens in year 4 as well.

1023
00:38:41,520 --> 00:38:44,480
In Year 5, like quite often it's
the, some schools will link, you

1024
00:38:44,560 --> 00:38:47,160
know how the results essentially
to the performance and they'll

1025
00:38:47,160 --> 00:38:48,720
judge you as a teacher based on
those stats.

1026
00:38:49,160 --> 00:38:52,000
There's lots of little things.
I think generally, systemically,

1027
00:38:52,000 --> 00:38:54,960
not necessarily just the stats,
the stats, sorry, that could

1028
00:38:54,960 --> 00:38:58,720
help schools alleviate pressure
with these tests and actually

1029
00:38:58,720 --> 00:39:01,680
just use them, what they're good
for, which is finding out the

1030
00:39:01,680 --> 00:39:03,960
attainment of children in
English and maths and having it

1031
00:39:03,960 --> 00:39:06,200
and running it across the
benchmark to know roughly where

1032
00:39:06,200 --> 00:39:08,240
we're where we're going.
Like gap analysis is still

1033
00:39:08,240 --> 00:39:10,000
extremely useful.
Yeah, of course.

1034
00:39:10,040 --> 00:39:13,120
So either maybe I need to think
about it a bit more, but I, I

1035
00:39:13,120 --> 00:39:17,120
overall, I'm not on the camp of
being the SAS.

1036
00:39:17,120 --> 00:39:21,320
No, I'm also not, not in the
camp of let's reform it and do

1037
00:39:21,320 --> 00:39:23,160
it a different way.
I still think we could explore

1038
00:39:23,160 --> 00:39:24,400
other ways of doing it.
Not in that.

1039
00:39:24,400 --> 00:39:26,160
I'm not in that.
Do you mean you're not?

1040
00:39:26,280 --> 00:39:29,240
In that I'm in it.
So you want to reform it.

1041
00:39:29,240 --> 00:39:31,400
I'm also in the case, yeah.
But what I'm saying is I'm like,

1042
00:39:31,720 --> 00:39:33,840
I'm not in any.
I'm not taking a hard position.

1043
00:39:33,840 --> 00:39:35,360
Yeah, of course.
I think we could make the stats

1044
00:39:35,360 --> 00:39:35,840
work.
Yep.

1045
00:39:36,160 --> 00:39:39,160
I think we could reform the
stats and do it entirely

1046
00:39:39,160 --> 00:39:41,400
differently.
Yeah, life went on in 2020 and

1047
00:39:41,400 --> 00:39:43,240
2021.
Yep, life went on after.

1048
00:39:43,240 --> 00:39:45,200
Exactly.
But I don't think we should just

1049
00:39:45,200 --> 00:39:48,640
straight up scrap it and do
nothing about it, which is what

1050
00:39:48,640 --> 00:39:49,920
you said, which you you're
basically saying.

1051
00:39:49,920 --> 00:39:51,200
I don't think many people think
that anyway.

1052
00:39:51,200 --> 00:39:52,920
I actually know quite a lot of
people think that online.

1053
00:39:52,920 --> 00:39:55,240
Maybe they think they should
just abolish the stats, like

1054
00:39:55,240 --> 00:39:57,640
straight up and replace it with
nothing and just do learning at

1055
00:39:57,640 --> 00:39:59,240
school and then they just go to
secondary school.

1056
00:39:59,240 --> 00:40:00,320
I don't actually think that's
the best.

1057
00:40:00,320 --> 00:40:02,120
Do those people also think you
shouldn't have an end of Year 5

1058
00:40:02,120 --> 00:40:03,280
test?
I don't know.

1059
00:40:03,280 --> 00:40:04,640
Because that, that that's my
point.

1060
00:40:04,760 --> 00:40:07,680
Like like you can still have an
end of year assessment probably

1061
00:40:07,800 --> 00:40:09,200
like so.
But that's what I mean.

1062
00:40:09,200 --> 00:40:11,400
Like people say stop testing
primary school children.

1063
00:40:11,400 --> 00:40:14,160
I'm like, why?
Yeah, yeah, I think testing is

1064
00:40:14,160 --> 00:40:16,600
good.
Like, like as in I'm seeing what

1065
00:40:16,600 --> 00:40:18,920
you know or don't know.
Yeah, yeah, especially on these

1066
00:40:18,920 --> 00:40:20,160
things.
Like do you know how to do long

1067
00:40:20,160 --> 00:40:21,760
division?
Well, I've tried it 10 times and

1068
00:40:21,760 --> 00:40:23,200
you, I got every single one
wrong.

1069
00:40:23,200 --> 00:40:26,280
So I'm going to help you.
So I'm going to help you.

1070
00:40:26,400 --> 00:40:28,360
Yeah, which is fine.
But they're probably referencing

1071
00:40:28,360 --> 00:40:30,080
something along the lines of
things that we've said in the

1072
00:40:30,080 --> 00:40:32,000
past, which is I don't actually
need that.

1073
00:40:32,000 --> 00:40:34,120
There is a level where I don't
need to test children to know

1074
00:40:34,120 --> 00:40:35,600
what they can and can't do
because I'm teaching them

1075
00:40:36,120 --> 00:40:37,680
everyday which is more
efficient.

1076
00:40:37,680 --> 00:40:38,880
I agree.
I still think there's a place

1077
00:40:38,880 --> 00:40:40,320
for them.
But some people I think will

1078
00:40:40,320 --> 00:40:42,280
argue you've been teaching them
all year.

1079
00:40:42,360 --> 00:40:44,520
You should know what they can
and can't do without a test at

1080
00:40:44,520 --> 00:40:46,920
the end of it telling you.
But but OK, true to an extent

1081
00:40:46,920 --> 00:40:51,600
and in terms of do the act of
completing a test does nothing

1082
00:40:51,600 --> 00:40:53,160
for you to get better at the
stuff, right.

1083
00:40:53,520 --> 00:40:55,920
But it's a it's what you do with
that information after.

1084
00:40:55,920 --> 00:40:57,400
I think that's people's problem
with SATS.

1085
00:40:57,920 --> 00:41:00,560
You do the SAT paper and it's
like we all agree that, Olivia,

1086
00:41:00,560 --> 00:41:03,760
an act of doing a test does not
help anyone in the moment.

1087
00:41:03,760 --> 00:41:05,320
Yeah, right.
It doesn't help anyone in the

1088
00:41:05,360 --> 00:41:06,560
moment.
Oh, it prepares them for tests

1089
00:41:06,560 --> 00:41:08,840
later on.
Well, yeah, OK, cool.

1090
00:41:08,840 --> 00:41:11,360
The test later on where what
happens after is what the

1091
00:41:11,560 --> 00:41:14,160
important thing as well.
So you do the test in the

1092
00:41:14,160 --> 00:41:15,840
moment.
I think everyone understands.

1093
00:41:15,840 --> 00:41:18,640
And if your argument is to not
do tests is that testing doesn't

1094
00:41:18,640 --> 00:41:21,600
help improve knowledge.
I was like, no, it never does.

1095
00:41:21,600 --> 00:41:24,880
That's not the point of testing,
but if you do a test and then

1096
00:41:24,880 --> 00:41:27,080
how that information is
interpreted afterwards, it's

1097
00:41:27,080 --> 00:41:29,040
really useful.
That's why I still think you can

1098
00:41:29,040 --> 00:41:31,360
have the Sats, still think you
can do a gap analysis, still

1099
00:41:31,360 --> 00:41:33,000
think at the end of every year
group you have some kind of

1100
00:41:33,000 --> 00:41:34,960
assessment to see where they're
at.

1101
00:41:35,080 --> 00:41:37,920
Where have you ended up at?
That's interesting for me to see

1102
00:41:38,080 --> 00:41:40,080
in a snapshot.
It's not to be or an end all,

1103
00:41:40,120 --> 00:41:42,720
but it's interesting for me to
see in a snapshot when every

1104
00:41:42,720 --> 00:41:45,600
other person in the whole year
group and maybe even country has

1105
00:41:45,600 --> 00:41:47,960
done the same questions.
I can't control that.

1106
00:41:47,960 --> 00:41:50,080
Otherwise, I'm just going to see
what they can do on their own in

1107
00:41:50,080 --> 00:41:53,400
the snapshot and understand the
pros and cons, and then from

1108
00:41:53,400 --> 00:41:55,440
there look at those gaps and
fill them.

1109
00:41:55,640 --> 00:41:59,960
The issue I think a lot of
people have year 345 in our

1110
00:41:59,960 --> 00:42:02,480
school, gaps will be passed up.
We don't understand what

1111
00:42:02,480 --> 00:42:04,560
children can and can't do.
It might inform intervention, it

1112
00:42:04,560 --> 00:42:07,160
might inform what the children
get in terms of helping them to

1113
00:42:07,160 --> 00:42:11,040
do the bit that test doesn't do.
Year 6 comes along, it feels as

1114
00:42:11,040 --> 00:42:14,040
if it's just a test, see what
they can do, they get a score.

1115
00:42:14,120 --> 00:42:15,720
Nothing happens with that
information.

1116
00:42:15,960 --> 00:42:18,760
And that's where I think it
falls apart is where if we're

1117
00:42:18,760 --> 00:42:21,800
testing just simply for a
snapshot of where they're at,

1118
00:42:22,080 --> 00:42:24,840
your argument makes more sense.
But I don't necessarily think

1119
00:42:25,080 --> 00:42:27,440
that therefore means we
shouldn't have testing at all,

1120
00:42:27,520 --> 00:42:28,920
which is what I think people
jump to.

1121
00:42:28,920 --> 00:42:30,960
It's like, if we're just taking
a snapshot, what's the point?

1122
00:42:30,960 --> 00:42:32,360
You know, your kids are really
well, it's pointless.

1123
00:42:32,480 --> 00:42:35,600
Well, no, I I think the snapshot
should then be used as a more

1124
00:42:35,600 --> 00:42:38,280
formalised way of getting
information from everyone all at

1125
00:42:38,280 --> 00:42:40,200
once.
Then secondary schools and see

1126
00:42:40,200 --> 00:42:41,520
that information and work from
it.

1127
00:42:41,520 --> 00:42:42,760
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
See where their gaps are.

1128
00:42:42,760 --> 00:42:45,760
So I don't think, I think it's a
weak argument to say that

1129
00:42:45,760 --> 00:42:48,680
testing you already know your
kids and testing doesn't tell

1130
00:42:48,680 --> 00:42:50,760
you anything more.
Well, it kind of does.

1131
00:42:50,760 --> 00:42:52,600
And it's what you do with that
information that's important.

1132
00:42:52,600 --> 00:42:55,120
So given that, then there's
going back around to one of the

1133
00:42:55,320 --> 00:42:57,880
sort of first hypotheticals we
asked, which was the person who

1134
00:42:57,880 --> 00:42:59,760
thinks we should just abolish
that entirely.

1135
00:42:59,760 --> 00:43:02,200
And you said, what do they think
about year five and four tests

1136
00:43:02,200 --> 00:43:03,880
if they use what you just said
there and say when are we OK

1137
00:43:03,880 --> 00:43:06,360
with year 4 and five?
And because we use gap, we

1138
00:43:06,360 --> 00:43:08,480
actually use the gap analysis in
all of those tests to inform

1139
00:43:08,640 --> 00:43:11,880
future teaching, whereas the six
SAT one is the outlier because

1140
00:43:11,880 --> 00:43:14,000
we don't they just do the test
and then we move on.

1141
00:43:14,000 --> 00:43:14,720
Yeah.
Would you?

1142
00:43:14,720 --> 00:43:16,880
Would you be more inclined?
To agree there is, there is an

1143
00:43:16,880 --> 00:43:19,240
argument at that point, because
all that's happening with the

1144
00:43:19,240 --> 00:43:21,360
SAT really is all that's
happening now, to be honest with

1145
00:43:21,360 --> 00:43:24,080
you is that it's judging the
school and the kids get the and

1146
00:43:24,080 --> 00:43:26,600
I understand why people won't be
like just sod that, right?

1147
00:43:26,720 --> 00:43:28,320
Because it's just being used for
the school.

1148
00:43:28,320 --> 00:43:30,360
We're not getting that bit after
that makes more sense.

1149
00:43:30,760 --> 00:43:33,040
And people always say when they
go to secondary school in year

1150
00:43:33,040 --> 00:43:35,360
7, a lot of schools just do
their own baseline test then,

1151
00:43:35,800 --> 00:43:37,000
right?
No one's saying they're

1152
00:43:37,000 --> 00:43:39,760
pointless because they're really
useful because the school get

1153
00:43:39,760 --> 00:43:42,560
the information of a snapshot
and see what they can do from

1154
00:43:42,560 --> 00:43:44,640
then.
So all all I think should happen

1155
00:43:44,640 --> 00:43:47,920
is there should be a bit more
transparency perhaps between.

1156
00:43:48,040 --> 00:43:50,200
If we're going to do a test at
end of year six in the same way

1157
00:43:50,200 --> 00:43:53,960
we do in end of year 345, the
end of year six data is given to

1158
00:43:53,960 --> 00:43:57,800
wherever they go to and it's
used to inform what they do.

1159
00:43:57,920 --> 00:44:00,040
If they're then just going to
sit another test at the start of

1160
00:44:00,040 --> 00:44:02,800
year 7 to see where they're at
then then yes, I agree.

1161
00:44:02,800 --> 00:44:05,320
One of those is pointless.
Yeah, one of those is completely

1162
00:44:05,320 --> 00:44:06,560
pointless.
And it's probably the probably

1163
00:44:06,560 --> 00:44:08,560
the Sats one because they don't
have a whole summer off.

1164
00:44:08,760 --> 00:44:10,240
And also it's between schools.
It's just.

1165
00:44:10,240 --> 00:44:11,520
Exactly.
It's not in your control of the

1166
00:44:11,520 --> 00:44:13,600
new school.
That I can I completely agree

1167
00:44:13,600 --> 00:44:16,800
with that, but I still I still
have this inkling in my where

1168
00:44:16,800 --> 00:44:19,600
I'm like, OK, do you know what I
think it's gone way too far.

1169
00:44:19,600 --> 00:44:22,240
The pressure's on the children
when the outcomes for the IT

1170
00:44:22,280 --> 00:44:23,640
doesn't actually help the
children that much.

1171
00:44:23,640 --> 00:44:25,840
Do this test like it does in the
previous years.

1172
00:44:25,840 --> 00:44:29,000
This is more about seeing where
to, but I do think schools do

1173
00:44:29,000 --> 00:44:30,440
need some accountability to wear
so.

1174
00:44:30,440 --> 00:44:31,200
This is the.
This is the.

1175
00:44:31,400 --> 00:44:32,560
Problem, my brain.
So.

1176
00:44:32,680 --> 00:44:36,080
So my point here is that's why
I'm saying something more along

1177
00:44:36,080 --> 00:44:41,480
the lines of what happened maybe
in 2020-2021 where schools

1178
00:44:41,480 --> 00:44:44,880
carried on, maybe for the fact
of helping the children.

1179
00:44:44,960 --> 00:44:47,720
We do need to look at those
league tables and think we can

1180
00:44:47,720 --> 00:44:49,440
still do a test at the end of
year 6, but there has to be

1181
00:44:49,440 --> 00:44:50,560
where there's pressure on the
schools.

1182
00:44:50,680 --> 00:44:53,520
Yeah, and or if there is the
same amount of pressure in the

1183
00:44:53,520 --> 00:44:55,200
school, because we're saying we
need to hold schools accountable

1184
00:44:55,200 --> 00:44:59,040
and see what they've done, we
have to enforce more rigidly

1185
00:44:59,320 --> 00:45:01,800
that that something's ring
fenced in the curriculum where

1186
00:45:01,800 --> 00:45:03,680
children aren't doing mass in
English all day for six months.

1187
00:45:03,680 --> 00:45:05,360
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
It's stupid.

1188
00:45:05,600 --> 00:45:07,080
Ofsted need to be able to drop
in.

1189
00:45:07,080 --> 00:45:09,440
If we're going to have Ofsted
and they drop in, and if they

1190
00:45:09,440 --> 00:45:11,680
see that happening, it should
just be we're going to be more

1191
00:45:11,680 --> 00:45:13,360
strict about it saying this is
not good for the children.

1192
00:45:13,720 --> 00:45:15,080
Let's not pretend this doesn't
happen.

1193
00:45:15,080 --> 00:45:16,640
It does happen.
Of course it does because of

1194
00:45:16,640 --> 00:45:17,680
pressure.
I get all that.

1195
00:45:17,920 --> 00:45:20,200
But we need to do something
about it because at the minute,

1196
00:45:20,200 --> 00:45:21,880
what's happening is the pressure
trickles down, trickles down,

1197
00:45:21,960 --> 00:45:24,240
trickles down, trickles down to
the kids who get all the

1198
00:45:24,240 --> 00:45:26,800
pressure for the school's
outcomes without the benefit of

1199
00:45:26,800 --> 00:45:28,920
doing a test because it's just
scrapped off that they go to

1200
00:45:28,920 --> 00:45:30,560
secondary school and they do a
new test anyway.

1201
00:45:30,720 --> 00:45:33,480
Yeah, it is.
I completely think it is broken

1202
00:45:33,480 --> 00:45:35,160
right now.
I just don't like this.

1203
00:45:35,360 --> 00:45:37,600
Scrap it completely.
It's like, OK, we just need to

1204
00:45:37,600 --> 00:45:39,000
have more nuanced conversation
that we just had.

1205
00:45:39,000 --> 00:45:41,200
Yeah, Yeah, definitely the
headline of scrap sats can be

1206
00:45:41,200 --> 00:45:42,480
interpreted so many different
ways.

1207
00:45:42,880 --> 00:45:45,160
I think we have to definitely
change.

1208
00:45:45,160 --> 00:45:47,400
It yeah, you have just
articulated why I always

1209
00:45:47,840 --> 00:45:49,840
struggle with this conversation
because sometimes I'm like,

1210
00:45:50,360 --> 00:45:51,800
yeah, no, we should scrap it.
Because everything you said

1211
00:45:51,800 --> 00:45:54,080
about the point of the point of
basically the point of asking

1212
00:45:54,080 --> 00:45:56,440
kids questions, whether it's in
a test format or a lesson

1213
00:45:56,440 --> 00:46:00,120
format, is to find out what they
know, analyse that, you know,

1214
00:46:00,320 --> 00:46:02,640
through your gap analysis or
whatever in the moment and then

1215
00:46:02,640 --> 00:46:03,440
act on it.
Right.

1216
00:46:03,720 --> 00:46:05,720
And when the SAS actively
doesn't do that and it's

1217
00:46:05,720 --> 00:46:08,480
literally just a benchmark only
for us, I'm always, and then I'm

1218
00:46:08,480 --> 00:46:09,640
like, oh, yeah, maybe we should
just scrap it.

1219
00:46:09,840 --> 00:46:11,200
But then I'm like, oh, but then,
but then there's no

1220
00:46:11,200 --> 00:46:13,160
accountability for schools that
we've decided we have key

1221
00:46:13,160 --> 00:46:14,480
stages.
And at the end of those key

1222
00:46:14,480 --> 00:46:17,360
stages, like they're pretty
sparse or they're pretty spread

1223
00:46:17,360 --> 00:46:19,160
out already.
Like, is it the worst thing in

1224
00:46:19,160 --> 00:46:21,080
the world just to have every
couple of years there's one

1225
00:46:21,080 --> 00:46:23,800
thing where we just go just
double, just double check that

1226
00:46:23,920 --> 00:46:25,640
we don't get to, you know, the
kids don't get to 16.

1227
00:46:25,640 --> 00:46:27,520
And then we find out that the
schools have just been laughing.

1228
00:46:27,520 --> 00:46:29,520
So I'm doing nothing.
We need some accountability.

1229
00:46:29,520 --> 00:46:32,200
So I'm always torn in my head as
to that.

1230
00:46:32,200 --> 00:46:34,680
And you, yeah, you've pretty
much just summarised why I can

1231
00:46:34,680 --> 00:46:37,280
never really quite land
somewhere and why honestly, if

1232
00:46:37,280 --> 00:46:39,000
you probably listen to this
podcast, there's probably other

1233
00:46:39,000 --> 00:46:41,240
times where I've been way more
one side and other times I've

1234
00:46:41,240 --> 00:46:43,040
been way more the other side
because I can't quite land

1235
00:46:43,040 --> 00:46:44,600
myself.
I think we've been quite

1236
00:46:44,600 --> 00:46:47,880
consistent in understanding that
there is definitely benefits of

1237
00:46:47,880 --> 00:46:48,440
both.
Yeah.

1238
00:46:48,680 --> 00:46:51,800
And I think, you know, we're not
shy of landing on one side,

1239
00:46:52,240 --> 00:46:53,760
right.
But I do think when we discuss

1240
00:46:53,760 --> 00:46:55,720
stuff we do, we do take into
account both sides.

1241
00:46:55,920 --> 00:46:58,040
And if we do land on a side,
it's just because there seems to

1242
00:46:58,040 --> 00:46:59,520
be more evidence.
It's not because we're ignoring

1243
00:46:59,680 --> 00:47:00,600
it.
So I find that fascinating.

1244
00:47:00,600 --> 00:47:02,840
That was really good.
Loads of questions, still loads

1245
00:47:02,840 --> 00:47:04,400
more questions.
We'll have to put you on next

1246
00:47:04,400 --> 00:47:04,840
week.
Yeah.

1247
00:47:05,160 --> 00:47:06,680
So we'll actually getting better
at that now, guys.

1248
00:47:06,720 --> 00:47:07,960
Thank you.
So much do join the WhatsApp

1249
00:47:07,960 --> 00:47:10,080
community down below and if
you've got this far, I'm going

1250
00:47:10,080 --> 00:47:13,080
to be a bit begging now because
we would love your ratings we'd

1251
00:47:13,080 --> 00:47:15,440
love you to share it.
The biggest thing you can do to

1252
00:47:15,440 --> 00:47:17,040
help us is to share this
podcast.

1253
00:47:17,040 --> 00:47:19,200
So if you enjoy it your
colleagues probably will as well

1254
00:47:19,200 --> 00:47:22,360
whack it in the WhatsApp group,
put it on your social media, tag

1255
00:47:22,360 --> 00:47:25,920
us and just spread the word.
It helps us so much.

1256
00:47:25,920 --> 00:47:28,480
We appreciate you guys.
Anything you want to say the?

1257
00:47:28,520 --> 00:47:31,840
Biggest thing you can do to help
yourself enjoy this podcast more

1258
00:47:31,840 --> 00:47:34,600
is join the WhatsApp group to
add your questions for the next

1259
00:47:34,600 --> 00:47:36,840
Q&A because we might answer your
question and then you'll enjoy

1260
00:47:36,840 --> 00:47:37,800
it more.
Because it's yours.

1261
00:47:37,800 --> 00:47:39,360
Follow us raters and scraps ads.